Literature DB >> 20017068

Validating a new measure of self-complexity.

Wenshu Luo1, David Watkins, Raymond Y H Lam.   

Abstract

The construct of self-complexity has been recognized as important for understanding psychological adjustment. However, research in this area has been impeded by measurement problems. In particular, the most commonly used measure, Linville's (1985, 1987) H statistic, cannot assess this construct appropriately. In this article, we present a new measure designed to tap two components of self-complexity separately: the number of self-aspects and the average distinction among them. We conducted a validation study with 131 Chinese college students. The results indicate that (a) this new measure is not confounded with conscious social desirability bias, (b) it has incremental validity beyond existing measures, and (c) the two components as assessed by this new measure are relatively independent and have different psychological functions. We discuss the implications of these findings for future studies of self-complexity and clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20017068     DOI: 10.1080/00223890902936223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Assess        ISSN: 0022-3891


  2 in total

1.  Self-Structures, Negative Events, and Adolescent Depression: Clarifying the Role of Self-Complexity in a Prospective, Multiwave Study.

Authors:  Joseph R Cohen; Kevin M Spiegler; Jami F Young; Benjamin L Hankin; John R Z Abela
Journal:  J Early Adolesc       Date:  2014-08

2.  Self-Complexity and Self-Concept Differentiation - What Have We Been Measuring for the Past 30 Years?

Authors:  Aleksandra Pilarska; Anna Suchańska
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2014-11-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.