Literature DB >> 20016966

Tissue and host tropism of influenza viruses: importance of quantitative analysis.

Hong Zhang1.   

Abstract

It is generally accepted that human influenza viruses preferentially bind to cell-surface glycoproteins/glycolipids containing sialic acids in alpha2,6-linkage; while avian and equine influenza viruses preferentially bind to those containing sialic acids in alpha2,3-linkage. Even though this generalized view is accurate for H3 subtype isolates, it may not be accurate and absolute for all subtypes of influenza A viruses and, therefore, needs to be reevaluated carefully and realistically. Some of the studies published in major scientific journals on the subject of tissue tropism of influenza viruses are inconsistent and caused confusion in the scientific community. One of the reasons for the inconsistency is that most studies were quantitative descriptions of sialic acid receptor distributions based on lectin or influenza virus immunohistochemistry results with limited numbers of stained cells. In addition, recent studies indicate that alpha2,3- and alpha2,6-linked sialic acids are not the sole receptors determining tissue and host tropism of influenza viruses. In fact, determinants for tissue and host tropism of human, avian and animal influenza viruses are more complex than what has been generally accepted. Other factors, such as glycan topology, concentration of invading viruses, local density of receptors, lipid raft microdomains, coreceptors or sialic acid-independent receptors, may also be important. To more efficiently control the global spread of pandemic influenza such as the current circulating influenza A H1N1, it is crucial to clarify the determinants for tissue and host tropism of influenza viruses through quantitative analysis of experimental results. In this review, I will comment on some conflicting issues related to tissue and host tropism of influenza viruses, discuss the importance of quantitative analysis of lectin and influenza virus immunohistochemistry results and point out directions for future studies in this area, which should lead to a better understanding of tissue and host tropism of influenza viruses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20016966     DOI: 10.1007/s11427-009-0161-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci China C Life Sci        ISSN: 1006-9305


  8 in total

1.  Histopathological evaluation of the diversity of cells susceptible to H5N1 virulent avian influenza virus.

Authors:  Haru Ogiwara; Fumihiko Yasui; Keisuke Munekata; Asako Takagi-Kamiya; Tsubasa Munakata; Namiko Nomura; Futoshi Shibasaki; Kazuhiko Kuwahara; Nobuo Sakaguchi; Yoshihiro Sakoda; Hiroshi Kida; Michinori Kohara
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Impact of chicken-origin cells on adaptation of a low pathogenic influenza virus.

Authors:  Shahla Shahsavandi; Mohammad Majid Ebrahimi; Ashraf Mohammadi; Nima Zarrin Lebas
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 3.  New insights into influenza A specificity: an evolution of paradigms.

Authors:  Ye Ji; Yohanna Jb White; Jodi A Hadden; Oliver C Grant; Robert J Woods
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 6.809

4.  Differential replication properties among H9N2 avian influenza viruses of Eurasian origin.

Authors:  Rokshana Parvin; Awad A Shehata; Kristin Heenemann; Malgorzata Gac; Antje Rueckner; Mohammad Y Halami; Thomas W Vahlenkamp
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.683

5.  Antiviral responses by Swine primary bronchoepithelial cells are limited compared to human bronchoepithelial cells following influenza virus infection.

Authors:  Mary J Hauser; Daniel Dlugolenski; Marie R Culhane; David E Wentworth; S Mark Tompkins; Ralph A Tripp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  New England harbor seal H3N8 influenza virus retains avian-like receptor specificity.

Authors:  Islam T M Hussein; Florian Krammer; Eric Ma; Michael Estrin; Karthik Viswanathan; Nathan W Stebbins; Devin S Quinlan; Ram Sasisekharan; Jonathan Runstadler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Expression of Factor X in BHK-21 Cells Promotes Low Pathogenic Influenza Viruses Replication.

Authors:  Shahla Shahsavandi; Mohammad Majid Ebrahimi; Shahin Masoudi; Hasan Izadi
Journal:  Adv Virol       Date:  2015-12-31

Review 8.  The Central Role of Non-Structural Protein 1 (NS1) in Influenza Biology and Infection.

Authors:  Nícia Rosário-Ferreira; António J Preto; Rita Melo; Irina S Moreira; Rui M M Brito
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.