Cynthia Fritschi1, Laurie Quinn1, Sue Penckofer2, Patricia M Surdyk3. 1. The Department of Biobehavioral Health Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Nursing (Dr Fritschi, Dr Quinn) 2. The School of Nursing, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois (Dr Penckofer) 3. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (Dr Surdyk)
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this descriptive study was to document the experience of wearing a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device in women with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). The availability of CGM has provided patients and clinicians with the opportunity to describe the immediate effects of diet, exercise, and medications on blood glucose levels; however, there are few data examining patients' experiences and acceptability of using CGM. METHODS: Thirty-five women with T2DM wore a CGM for 3 days. Semistructured interviews were conducted to capture the self-described experience of wearing a CGM. Three open-ended questions were used to guide the participants' self-reflection. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed. RESULTS: The women verbalized both positive and negative aspects of needing to check their blood glucose more frequently and wearing the monitor. After viewing the results, most women were surprised by the magnitude and frequency of blood glucose excursions. They immediately examined their behaviors during the time they wore the CGM. Independent problem-solving skills became apparent as they attempted to identify reasons for hyperglycemia by retracing food intake, physical activity, and stress experiences during the period of CGM. Most important, the majority of women stated they were interested in changing their diabetes-related self-care behaviors, especially eating and exercise behaviors, after reviewing their CGM results. CONCLUSIONS: CGM is generally acceptable to women with T2DM and offers patients and their health care practitioners a possible alternative to routine glucose monitoring for assessing the effects of real-life events on blood glucose levels.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this descriptive study was to document the experience of wearing a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device in women with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). The availability of CGM has provided patients and clinicians with the opportunity to describe the immediate effects of diet, exercise, and medications on blood glucose levels; however, there are few data examining patients' experiences and acceptability of using CGM. METHODS: Thirty-five women with T2DM wore a CGM for 3 days. Semistructured interviews were conducted to capture the self-described experience of wearing a CGM. Three open-ended questions were used to guide the participants' self-reflection. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed. RESULTS: The women verbalized both positive and negative aspects of needing to check their blood glucose more frequently and wearing the monitor. After viewing the results, most women were surprised by the magnitude and frequency of blood glucose excursions. They immediately examined their behaviors during the time they wore the CGM. Independent problem-solving skills became apparent as they attempted to identify reasons for hyperglycemia by retracing food intake, physical activity, and stress experiences during the period of CGM. Most important, the majority of women stated they were interested in changing their diabetes-related self-care behaviors, especially eating and exercise behaviors, after reviewing their CGM results. CONCLUSIONS:CGM is generally acceptable to women with T2DM and offers patients and their health care practitioners a possible alternative to routine glucose monitoring for assessing the effects of real-life events on blood glucose levels.
Authors: H J Yoo; H G An; S Y Park; O H Ryu; H Y Kim; J A Seo; E G Hong; D H Shin; Y H Kim; S G Kim; K M Choi; I B Park; J M Yu; S H Baik Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2008-08-12 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Cynthia Fritschi; Laurie Quinn; Eileen D Hacker; Sue M Penckofer; Edward Wang; Marquis Foreman; Carol E Ferrans Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2012-06-19 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Angela Y M Leung; Pui Hing Chau; Isaac S H Leung; Michael Tse; Perick L C Wong; Wai Ming Tam; Doris Y P Leung Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-04-05 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Bryan Gibson; Robin L Marcus; Nancy Staggers; Jason Jones; Matthew Samore; Charlene Weir Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2012-05-10 Impact factor: 5.428