Literature DB >> 20016012

Effects of daily snack food intake on food reinforcement depend on body mass index and energy density.

Erika N Clark1, Amber M Dewey, Jennifer L Temple.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The reinforcing value of food plays a role in food consumption. We have shown previously that daily intake of a high-energy-density (HED) snack food decreases food reinforcement and food liking in nonobese women but increases food reinforcement and decreases food liking in obese women.
OBJECTIVE: These previous studies were conducted with the use of only HED snack foods. The purpose of this study was to determine whether these effects generalize to low-energy-density (LED) foods.
DESIGN: Participants (n = 53) had food reinforcement and food liking tested at baseline and then again after 2 wk of daily consumption of 60-g portions of an HED (n = 26) or an LED (n = 27) snack food.
RESULTS: We observed a decrease in food reinforcement in women with a lower body mass index (BMI) and an increase in food reinforcement in women with a higher BMI after 14 d of consumption of an HED snack food. Food liking decreased in all women, regardless of BMI, after repeated consumption of HED foods. Conversely, all women, regardless of BMI, showed a decrease in food reinforcement after 14 d of LED snack food consumption. Women with a lower BMI who consumed LED snacks also showed a decrease in liking, but women with a higher BMI who consumed LED foods reported no change in liking.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that changes in food reinforcement after daily snack food intake are influenced by both BMI and the energy density of the foods. In addition, changes in food reinforcement cannot be explained by changes in food liking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20016012     DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  29 in total

1.  "The next mouthful will be the best": influence of prevision of the pleasure on the decision of having a second helping of a just eaten food.

Authors:  Piergiuseppe Vinai; Luisa Vinai; Paolo Vinai; Cecilia Bruno; Stacia Studt; Silvia Cardetti; Donatella Masante; Maurizio Speciale
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 4.652

2.  Behavioral and physiological characteristics associated with learning performance on an appetitive probabilistic selection task.

Authors:  Jennifer R Sadler; Grace E Shearrer; Afroditi Papantoni; Penny Gordon-Larsen; Kyle S Burger
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2020-05-29

3.  The relationships between eating disorder pathology and relative reinforcing value of food, delay discounting, and related constructs in adolescents.

Authors:  Katherine N Balantekin; Amanda M Ziegler; Amanda K Crandall; Jennifer L Temple
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Elevated energy intake is correlated with hyperresponsivity in attentional, gustatory, and reward brain regions while anticipating palatable food receipt.

Authors:  Kyle S Burger; Eric Stice
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Gain in Body Fat Is Associated with Increased Striatal Response to Palatable Food Cues, whereas Body Fat Stability Is Associated with Decreased Striatal Response.

Authors:  Eric Stice; Sonja Yokum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Taste and food reinforcement in non-overweight youth.

Authors:  Leonard H Epstein; Katelyn A Carr; Jennifer L Scheid; Eden Gebre; Alexis O'Brien; Rocco A Paluch; Jennifer L Temple
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 7.  Factors that influence the reinforcing value of foods and beverages.

Authors:  Jennifer L Temple
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-05-01

Review 8.  Neural vulnerability factors that increase risk for future weight gain.

Authors:  Eric Stice; Sonja Yokum
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Reducing variety enhances effectiveness of family-based treatment for pediatric obesity.

Authors:  Leonard H Epstein; Colleen Kilanowski; Rocco A Paluch; Hollie Raynor; Tinuke Oluyomi Daniel
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2015-02-13

10.  Influence of sedentary, social, and physical alternatives on food reinforcement.

Authors:  Katelyn A Carr; Leonard H Epstein
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 4.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.