Literature DB >> 20015917

Exploring differences in referrals to a hospice at home service in two socio-economically distinct areas of Manchester, UK.

Malcolm Campbell1, Gunn Grande, Charlotte Wilson, Ann-Louise Caress, Dai Roberts.   

Abstract

In order to provide equitable access to hospice at home palliative care services, it is important to identify the socio-economic factors associated with poorer access. In this population-based study we aimed to test the inverse care law by exploring how socio-economic status and other key demographic indicators were associated with referral rates in two distinct areas (Salford and Trafford) served by the same service. Secondary data from the UK National Census 2001, North West Cancer Intelligence Service (2004) and hospice at home service referral data (2004-06) was collated for both areas. Descriptive analysis profiled electoral ward characteristics whilst simple correlations and regression modelling estimated associations with referral rates. Referral rates were lower and cancer mortality higher in the most deprived areas (Salford). Referral rates were significantly associated with deprivation, particularly multiple deprivation, but not significantly associated with cancer mortality (service model and resources available were held constant). At the population level, the socio-economic characteristics of those referred to hospice at home rather than service provision strongly predicted referral rates. This has implications for the allocation and targeting of resources and contributes important findings to future work exploring equitable access at organizational and professional levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20015917     DOI: 10.1177/0269216309354032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  8 in total

1.  Association of hospice patients' income and care level with place of death.

Authors:  Joshua S Barclay; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; James A Tulsky; Kimberly S Johnson
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Use of Palliative Care in Patients With End-Stage COPD and Receiving Home Oxygen: National Trends and Barriers to Care in the United States.

Authors:  Barret Rush; Paul Hertz; Alexandra Bond; Robert C McDermid; Leo Anthony Celi
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Hospice care access inequalities: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Jake Tobin; Alice Rogers; Isaac Winterburn; Sebastian Tullie; Asanish Kalyanasundaram; Isla Kuhn; Stephen Barclay
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.633

4.  Persistent inequalities in Hospice at Home provision.

Authors:  Jackie Buck; Liz Webb; Lorraine Moth; Lynn Morgan; Stephen Barclay
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.568

5.  Demographics, Socioeconomic Context, and the Spread of Infectious Disease: The Case of COVID-19.

Authors:  Yung-Hsiang Ying; Wen-Li Lee; Ying-Chen Chi; Mei-Jung Chen; Koyin Chang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Minding the gap: access to palliative care and the homeless.

Authors:  Lise Huynh; Blair Henry; Naheed Dosani
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.234

7.  Optimum hospice at home services for end-of-life care: protocol of a mixed-methods study employing realist evaluation.

Authors:  Claire Butler; Charlotte Brigden; Heather Gage; Peter Williams; Laura Holdsworth; Kay Greene; Bee Wee; Stephen Barclay; Patricia Wilson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Advance care planning in England: Is there an association with place of death? Secondary analysis of data from the National Survey of Bereaved People.

Authors:  Josie Dixon; Derek King; Martin Knapp
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.568

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.