Literature DB >> 20015868

Determinants of participation in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing.

My von Euler-Chelpin1, Klaus Brasso, Elsebeth Lynge.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers in men and women. Participation rates in faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) screening activities are, however, relatively low. In terms of lowering the colorectal cancer mortality, high participation rates are essential, and therefore it is important to understand the barriers to FOBT screening.
METHODS: We undertook a systematic search through PUBMED, Medline, EMBASE and PsycINFO in order to identify studies that provide information on socio-demographic determinants of participation in FOBT screening.
RESULTS: FOBT participation varied considerably across countries, but they have rarely been above 60%. The use of other health-care services was in most studies a strong determinant for participation in screening with FOBT. There was a tendency to higher participation among women than among men and among married as opposed to not married, but determinants varied across countries and test settings. There was no systematic variation in participation across age groups.
CONCLUSION: The participation pattern depends in part on local circumstances, which makes it difficult to point to a general strategy for increasing the uptake in FOBT screening. This stresses the need for monitoring of individual screening programmes and developing information strategies targeted to the local participation pattern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20015868     DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdp115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)        ISSN: 1741-3842            Impact factor:   2.341


  20 in total

1.  Cancer fatalism and poor self-rated health mediate the association between socioeconomic status and uptake of colorectal cancer screening in England.

Authors:  Anne Miles; Sandra Rainbow; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Inadequate Utilization of Diagnostic Colonoscopy Following Abnormal FIT Results in an Integrated Safety-Net System.

Authors:  Rachel B Issaka; Maneesh H Singh; Sachiko M Oshima; Victoria J Laleau; Carly D Rachocki; Ellen H Chen; Lukejohn W Day; Urmimala Sarkar; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening intent and uptake among adult Non-Hispanic Black men.

Authors:  Charles R Rogers; Roger Figueroa; Ellen Brooks; Ethan M Petersen; Carson D Kennedy; Darrell M Gray Ii; Michael Sapienza; Man Hung
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 6.166

4.  Factors influencing colorectal cancer screening participation.

Authors:  Antonio Z Gimeno García
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.260

5.  COVID-19 Disruptions to Endoscopic Surveillance in Lynch Syndrome.

Authors:  Danielle B McKenna; Christina M Dudzik; Shria Kumar; Nadim Mahmud; Bryson W Katona
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2021-02-24

Review 6.  Population-based colorectal cancer screening: comparison of two fecal occult blood test.

Authors:  Miren B Zubero; Eunate Arana-Arri; José I Pijoan; Isabel Portillo; Isabel Idigoras; Antonio López-Urrutia; Ana Samper; Begoña Uranga; Carmen Rodríguez; Luis Bujanda
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 5.810

7.  Patients' perspectives on providing a stool sample to their GP: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Donna M Lecky; Meredith K D Hawking; Cliodna A M McNulty
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  A population-based cross-sectional study of colorectal cancer screening practices of first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Ryan J Courtney; Christine L Paul; Mariko L Carey; Robert W Sanson-Fisher; Finlay A Macrae; Catherine D'Este; David Hill; Daniel Barker; Jody Simmons
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ronan E O'Carroll; Julie A Chambers; Linda Brownlee; Gillian Libby; Robert J C Steele
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening in Scotland (ARTICS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ronan E O'Carroll; Robert J C Steele; Gillian Libby; Linda Brownlee; Julie A Chambers
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.