Literature DB >> 20015705

Preliminary psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory (ChCPCI) in a Hong Kong Chinese population.

Wing S Wong1, Mark P Jensen, Kan H Mak, Barry K H Tam, Richard Fielding.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The Chronic Pain Coping Inventory (CPCI) is a frequently used measure that assesses 8 categories of coping strategies that patients might use to cope with chronic pain. Despite its good psychometric properties and widespread use, the instrument has not been tested for its applicability and validity in non-Western populations, such as among Chinese. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of a Chinese translation of the 42-item CPCI (ChCPCI-42) in a sample of Chinese patients with chronic pain (n = 208). In addition to the ChCPCI-42, the patients were administered the Chronic Pain Grade (CPG) questionnaire, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Centre for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D), and questions assessing sociodemographic characteristics. Results of confirmatory factor analyses revealed that of the ChCPCI-42 8 scales, 6 demonstrated acceptable-to-good data-model fit (CFI >or= 0.90) and 2 demonstrated medium fit (CFI >or= 0.85). The 8 scales demonstrated adequate to good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha, 0.69 to 0.79) and correlated with CES-D, PCS, pain intensity, and disability in expected directions. Results of hierarchical multiple regression analyses showed that the ChCPCI-42 scales predicted concurrent depression (F (8,177) = 3.07, P < .01) and pain disability (F (1, 179) = 4.35, P < .001) scores, the Task Persistence scale being the strongest unique predictor among the 8 scales. The findings support the factorial validity and reliability of a 42-item CPCI that can be used among Chinese patients with chronic pain. PERSPECTIVE: The report outlines the first validation of the CPCI for use in Hong Kong Chinese. This makes available a suitable instrument for chronic pain research in the Southern Chinese population and will help to elucidate similarities and differences in pain coping between Chinese and other ethnic groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20015705     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  4 in total

1.  Development of the Italian version of the 42-item Chronic Pain Coping Inventory, CPCI-I: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability and validity.

Authors:  Marco Monticone; Simona Ferrante; Ines Giorgi; Caterina Galandra; Barbara Rocca; Calogero Foti
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Adult attachment and approaches to activity engagement in chronic pain.

Authors:  Nicole Emma Andrews; Pamela J Meredith; Jenny Strong; Genevieve F Donohue
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.037

3.  Structural validity of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory-Brazilian version.

Authors:  Layz Alves Ferreira Souza; Lilian Varanda Pereira; Louise Amália de Moura; Leidy-Johanna Rueda Díaz; Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro da Cruz; José Aparecido Da Silva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Validation of a core patient-reported-outcome measure set for operationalizing success in multimodal pain therapy: useful for depicting long-term success?

Authors:  Carolin Donath; Christa Geiß; Christoph Schön
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.