BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare chest low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) with chest radiography (CXR) in the assessment of febrile acute myeloid leukaemia neutropenic patients. METHODS: A prospective non-randomized study was carried out between 30 May, 2003 and 3 June, 2004 in consecutive neutropenic patients who required imaging of the thorax and were treated for acute myeloid leukaemia. Each patient had a baseline 2-view chest radiograph followed by LDCT. Both the CXR and the LDCT studies were blindly and independently reviewed by two chest radiologists. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled: 24 male and 16 female, mean age 53.5 years (range 18-83) and an average neutrophil count of 0.78 x 10(9)/L. Patients had CXR within a mean of 40 min from the LDCT. Overall, 31 (77.5%) of 40 CXR were abnormal, whereas LDCT detected abnormalities in 38 (95%) of 40 patients. LDCT demonstrated three times the number of lung nodules as CXR and twice as many ground-glass opacities. Lung consolidation was detected similarly using both techniques, but LDCT demonstrated more extensive and multi-focal consolidation. The majority of nodules detected only on LDCT were subcentimetre in diameter. The additional information provided by LDCT led to an alteration in the clinical management of 11 (27.5%) of 40 patients. CONCLUSION: LDCT is a useful tool in the initial investigation of suspected pulmonary complication in neutropenic patients. This is supported by the additional information it provides to the CXR with reduced radiation when compared to conventional CT. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare chest low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) with chest radiography (CXR) in the assessment of febrile acute myeloid leukaemia neutropenicpatients. METHODS: A prospective non-randomized study was carried out between 30 May, 2003 and 3 June, 2004 in consecutive neutropenicpatients who required imaging of the thorax and were treated for acute myeloid leukaemia. Each patient had a baseline 2-view chest radiograph followed by LDCT. Both the CXR and the LDCT studies were blindly and independently reviewed by two chest radiologists. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled: 24 male and 16 female, mean age 53.5 years (range 18-83) and an average neutrophil count of 0.78 x 10(9)/L. Patients had CXR within a mean of 40 min from the LDCT. Overall, 31 (77.5%) of 40 CXR were abnormal, whereas LDCT detected abnormalities in 38 (95%) of 40 patients. LDCT demonstrated three times the number of lung nodules as CXR and twice as many ground-glass opacities. Lung consolidation was detected similarly using both techniques, but LDCT demonstrated more extensive and multi-focal consolidation. The majority of nodules detected only on LDCT were subcentimetre in diameter. The additional information provided by LDCT led to an alteration in the clinical management of 11 (27.5%) of 40 patients. CONCLUSION: LDCT is a useful tool in the initial investigation of suspected pulmonary complication in neutropenicpatients. This is supported by the additional information it provides to the CXR with reduced radiation when compared to conventional CT. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Susanne Ghandili; Philipp H von Kroge; Marcel Simon; Frank O Henes; Holger Rohde; Armin Hoffmann; Nick Benjamin Lindeman; Carsten Bokemeyer; Walter Fiedler; Franziska Modemann Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: J Kevin Hicks; Rod E Quilitz; Rami S Komrokji; Timothy E Kubal; Jeffrey E Lancet; Yanina Pasikhova; Dahui Qin; Wonhee So; Gisela Caceres; Kerry Kelly; Yasmina S Salchert; Kevin Shahbazian; Farnoosh Abbas-Aghababazadeh; Brooke L Fridley; Ana P Velez; Howard L McLeod; John N Greene Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: M G Gerritsen; M J Willemink; E Pompe; T van der Bruggen; A van Rhenen; J W J Lammers; F Wessels; R W Sprengers; P A de Jong; M C Minnema Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Maximilian Christopeit; Martin Schmidt-Hieber; Rosanne Sprute; Oliver A Cornely; Georg Maschmeyer; Dieter Buchheidt; Marcus Hentrich; Meinolf Karthaus; Olaf Penack; Markus Ruhnke; Florian Weissinger Journal: Ann Hematol Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 3.673
Authors: Hae Jin Kim; So Young Park; Ho Yun Lee; Kyung Soo Lee; Kyung Eun Shin; Jung Won Moon Journal: Cancer Res Treat Date: 2014-07-18 Impact factor: 4.679
Authors: Eui Jin Hwang; Jong Hyuk Lee; Jae Hyun Kim; Woo Hyeon Lim; Jin Mo Goo; Chang Min Park Journal: BMC Pulm Med Date: 2021-12-07 Impact factor: 3.317