Literature DB >> 20015487

Cross-modal facilitation in speech prosody.

Jessica M Foxton1, Louis-David Riviere, Pascal Barone.   

Abstract

Speech prosody has traditionally been considered solely in terms of its auditory features, yet correlated visual features exist, such as head and eyebrow movements. This study investigated the extent to which visual prosodic features are able to affect the perception of the auditory features. Participants were presented with videos of a speaker pronouncing two words, with visual features of emphasis on one of these words. For each trial, participants saw one video where the two words were identical in both pitch and amplitude, and another video where there was a difference in either pitch or amplitude that was congruent or incongruent with the visual changes. Participants were asked to decide which video contained the sound difference. Thresholds were obtained for the congruent and incongruent videos, and for an auditory-alone condition. It was found that the congruent thresholds were better than the incongruent thresholds for both pitch and amplitude changes. Interestingly, the congruent thresholds for amplitude were better than for the auditory-alone condition, which implies that the visual features improve sensitivity to loudness changes. These results demonstrate that visual stimuli can affect auditory thresholds for changes in pitch and amplitude, and furthermore support the view that visual prosodic features enhance speech processing. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20015487     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  5 in total

1.  Automatic facial mimicry in response to dynamic emotional stimuli in five-month-old infants.

Authors:  Tomoko Isomura; Tamami Nakano
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Cross-modal facilitation of auditory discrimination in a frog.

Authors:  Logan S James; A Leonie Baier; Rachel A Page; Paul Clements; Kimberly L Hunter; Ryan C Taylor; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.812

3.  Receptive prosody in nonfluent primary progressive aphasias.

Authors:  Jonathan D Rohrer; Disa Sauter; Sophie Scott; Martin N Rossor; Jason D Warren
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  The variability of multisensory processes of natural stimuli in human and non-human primates in a detection task.

Authors:  Cécile Juan; Céline Cappe; Baptiste Alric; Benoit Roby; Sophie Gilardeau; Pascal Barone; Pascal Girard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Visual-Tactile Spatial Multisensory Interaction in Adults With Autism and Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Noel; Michelle D Failla; Jennifer M Quinde-Zlibut; Zachary J Williams; Madison Gerdes; John M Tracy; Alisa R Zoltowski; Jennifer H Foss-Feig; Heathman Nichols; Kristan Armstrong; Stephan H Heckers; Randolph R Blake; Mark T Wallace; Sohee Park; Carissa J Cascio
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.157

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.