Literature DB >> 20015260

Proposed definition of environmental damage illustrated by the cases of genetically modified crops and invasive species.

Robert Bartz1, Ulrich Heink, Ingo Kowarik.   

Abstract

The introduction of non-native plant species and the release of genetically modified (GM) crops can induce environmental changes at gene to ecosystem levels. Regulatory frameworks such as the Convention on Biological Diversity or the EU Deliberate Release Directive aim to prevent environmental damage but do not define the term. Although ecologists and conservationists often refer to environmental effects of GM crops or invasive species as damage, most authors do not disclose their normative assumptions or explain why some environmental impacts are regarded as detrimental and others are not. Thus far, a concise definition of environmental damage is missing and is necessary for a transparent assessment of environmental effects or risks. Therefore, we suggest defining environmental damage as a significant adverse effect on a biotic or abiotic conservation resource (i.e., a biotic or abiotic natural resource that is protected by conservational or environmental legislation) that has an impact on the value of the conservation resource, the conservation resource as an ecosystem component, or the sustainable use of the conservation resource. This definition relies on three normative assumptions: only concrete effects on a conservation resource can be damages; only adverse effects that lead to a decrease in the value of the conservation resource can be damages; and only significant adverse effects constitute damage to a conservation resource. Applying this definition within the framework of environmental risk assessment requires further normative determinations, for example, selection of a threshold to distinguish between adverse and significant adverse effects and approaches for assessing the environmental value of conservation resources. Such determinations, however, are not part of the definition of environmental damage. Rather they are part of the definition's operationalization through assessment procedures, which must be grounded in a comprehensible definition of environmental damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20015260     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01385.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  5 in total

1.  Environmental change challenges decision-making during post-market environmental monitoring of transgenic crops.

Authors:  Olivier Sanvido; Jörg Romeis; Franz Bigler
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Effects of a Major Tree Invader on Urban Woodland Arthropods.

Authors:  Sascha Buchholz; Hedwig Tietze; Ingo Kowarik; Jens Schirmel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Are Limits of Concern a useful concept to improve the environmental risk assessment of GM plants?

Authors:  Marion Dolezel; Marianne Miklau; Andreas Heissenberger; Wolfram Reichenbecher
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 5.893

4.  Regulation of GM Organisms for Invasive Species Control.

Authors:  Heidi J Mitchell; Detlef Bartsch
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-01-21

5.  A unified classification of alien species based on the magnitude of their environmental impacts.

Authors:  Tim M Blackburn; Franz Essl; Thomas Evans; Philip E Hulme; Jonathan M Jeschke; Ingolf Kühn; Sabrina Kumschick; Zuzana Marková; Agata Mrugała; Wolfgang Nentwig; Jan Pergl; Petr Pyšek; Wolfgang Rabitsch; Anthony Ricciardi; David M Richardson; Agnieszka Sendek; Montserrat Vilà; John R U Wilson; Marten Winter; Piero Genovesi; Sven Bacher
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 8.029

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.