BACKGROUND: HIV patients on protease inhibitors have greater risk of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) but little is known about treatment-naïve patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Authors conducted a prospective single-center study from Soweto, South Africa, comparing the clinical and angiographic features of treatment-naïve HIV positive and negative patients with ACS. Between March 2004 and February 2008, 30 consecutive treatment-naïve HIV patients with ACS were compared to the next HIV-negative patient as a 1:1 control. HIV patients were younger (43 +/- 7 vs. 54 +/- 13, P = 0.004) and, besides smoking (73% vs. 33%, P = 0.002), had fewer risk factors than the control group with less hypertension (23% vs. 77%, P = 0.0001), diabetes (3% vs. 23%, P = 0.05), LDL hyperlipidemia (2.2 +/- 0.9 vs. 3.0 +/- 1.2, P = 0.006), and other coronary risk factors (7% vs. 53%, P = 0.0001). HDL was lower in the HIV group (0.8 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.4, P = 0.001). Atherosclerotic burden was lower in the HIV group with more normal infarct-related arteries (47% vs. 13%, P = 0.005) but a higher degree of large thrombus burden (43% vs. 17%, P = 0.02). Stents were used to a similar degree in HIV and control patients (30% vs. 37%, P = 0.78) with more target lesion revascularization in the HIV group (56% vs. 0%, P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Treatment-naïve HIV patients with ACS are younger and have fewer traditional risk factors than HIV-negative patients. HIV patients have less atherosclerotic but higher thrombotic burden which may imply a prothrombotic state in the pathogenesis of ACS in these patients.
BACKGROUND:HIVpatients on protease inhibitors have greater risk of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) but little is known about treatment-naïve patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Authors conducted a prospective single-center study from Soweto, South Africa, comparing the clinical and angiographic features of treatment-naïve HIV positive and negative patients with ACS. Between March 2004 and February 2008, 30 consecutive treatment-naïve HIVpatients with ACS were compared to the next HIV-negative patient as a 1:1 control. HIVpatients were younger (43 +/- 7 vs. 54 +/- 13, P = 0.004) and, besides smoking (73% vs. 33%, P = 0.002), had fewer risk factors than the control group with less hypertension (23% vs. 77%, P = 0.0001), diabetes (3% vs. 23%, P = 0.05), LDL hyperlipidemia (2.2 +/- 0.9 vs. 3.0 +/- 1.2, P = 0.006), and other coronary risk factors (7% vs. 53%, P = 0.0001). HDL was lower in the HIV group (0.8 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.4, P = 0.001). Atherosclerotic burden was lower in the HIV group with more normal infarct-related arteries (47% vs. 13%, P = 0.005) but a higher degree of large thrombus burden (43% vs. 17%, P = 0.02). Stents were used to a similar degree in HIV and control patients (30% vs. 37%, P = 0.78) with more target lesion revascularization in the HIV group (56% vs. 0%, P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Treatment-naïve HIVpatients with ACS are younger and have fewer traditional risk factors than HIV-negative patients. HIVpatients have less atherosclerotic but higher thrombotic burden which may imply a prothrombotic state in the pathogenesis of ACS in these patients.
Authors: Gerald S Bloomfield; Prateeti Khazanie; Alison Morris; Cristina Rabadán-Diehl; Laura A Benjamin; David Murdoch; Virginia S Radcliff; Eric J Velazquez; Charles Hicks Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2014-09-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Katherine Kentoffio; Alfred Albano; Bruce Koplan; Maggie Feng; Rahul G Muthalaly; Jeffrey I Campbell; Ruth Sentongo; Russell P Tracy; Robert Peck; Samson Okello; Alexander C Tsai; Mark J Siedner Journal: Glob Heart Date: 2019-10-01
Authors: Anthony C Becker; Elena Libhaber; Karen Sliwa; Sham Singh; Simon Stewart; Mohammed Tikly; Mohammed R Essop Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2011-10-04
Authors: Kathleen M S E Reyskens; Tarryn-Lee Fisher; Jonathan C Schisler; Wendi G O'Connor; Arlin B Rogers; Monte S Willis; Cynthia Planesse; Florence Boyer; Philippe Rondeau; Emmanuel Bourdon; M Faadiel Essop Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-09-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Emily P Hyle; Bongani M Mayosi; Keren Middelkoop; Mosepele Mosepele; Emily B Martey; Rochelle P Walensky; Linda-Gail Bekker; Virginia A Triant Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 3.295