Literature DB >> 20014603

Cricothyroidotomy: comparison of three different techniques on a porcine airway.

V Mariappa1, E Stachowski, M Balik, P Clark, V Nayyar.   

Abstract

We compared three different cricothyroidotomy techniques on a cadaveric porcine airway model to determine the most rapid, successful and safe method in emergency situations. In this observational comparative bench-test, surgical or scalpel cricothyroidotomy (ST), Cook Melker Cricothyrotomy Kit (CM) and Portex Cricothyroidotomy Kit (PCK) were evaluated. After a familiarisation program, four operators performed five procedures using each of the techniques. A dissected pig airway was housed in an airway training manikin. Time to successful completion of the procedure, complications and anatomical variations in the pig larynx were recorded. A patent airway was established in 20 of 20 (100%) attempts with CM technique, 11 of 20 (55%) with ST and six of 20 (30%) with PCK technique. The CM technique was associated with a higher success rate (P <0.001). There was no significant difference (P=0.4) in the median time (interquartile range) taken to achieve a patent airway; CM 50 seconds (40 to 57), ST 47 seconds (41 to 55) and PCK 63 seconds (41 to 150). There was a higher rate of posterior tracheal wall injury with the PCK technique (n=11) and ST technique (n=5). No complications were observed with CM technique. There were no significant anatomical variations in the pig larynxes. We conclude that the CM technique is safe, rapid and has a significantly higher success rate in achieving an artificial airway in this airway model. Overall, all the participants in our study preferred to use this kit in an emergency situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20014603     DOI: 10.1177/0310057X0903700602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 0310-057X            Impact factor:   1.669


  8 in total

Review 1.  [S1 guidelines on airway management].

Authors:  T Piepho; E Cavus; R Noppens; C Byhahn; V Dörges; B Zwissler; A Timmermann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  S1 guidelines on airway management : Guideline of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  T Piepho; E Cavus; R Noppens; C Byhahn; V Dörges; B Zwissler; A Timmermann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Invasive and surgical procedures in pre-hospital care: what is the need?

Authors:  I M Shapey; D S Kumar; K Roberts
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  How to Initiate and Perform Simulation-based Airway Management Training More Effectively and Efficiently in China?

Authors:  Dong Yang; Xiao-Ming Deng; Fu-Shan Xue; Juan Zhi
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  A comparison of three techniques for cricothyrotomy on a manikin.

Authors:  Oliver Poole; Michael Vargo; JinBin Zhang; Orlando Hung
Journal:  Can J Respir Ther       Date:  2017-05-01

6.  Emergency cricothyroidotomy performed by inexperienced clinicians--surgical technique versus indicator-guided puncture technique.

Authors:  Matthias Helm; Björn Hossfeld; Christian Jost; Lorenz Lampl; Tobias Böckers
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Comparison of a percutaneous device and the bougie-assisted surgical technique for emergency cricothyrotomy: an experimental study on a porcine model performed by air ambulance anaesthesiologists.

Authors:  Anders R Nakstad; Per P Bredmose; Mårten Sandberg
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 8.  Emergency cricothyrotomy--a systematic review.

Authors:  Sofie Langvad; Per Kristian Hyldmo; Anders Rostrup Nakstad; Gunn Elisabeth Vist; Marten Sandberg
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.953

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.