Literature DB >> 20014387

Hippocampal signals for strong memory when associative memory is available and when it is not.

Peter E Wais1.   

Abstract

The paired-associate task has been used with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in studies that assessed the role of the medial temporal lobe (MTL) subserving recollection and familiarity.Some researchers have interpreted their results to mean that the hippocampus selectively subserves recollection and not familiarity[cf., Eichenbaum et al., (2007) Annu Rev Neurosci 30:123–152]. Yet many of these results confound recollection and familiarity with strong and weak memories, and it is not clear whether the conclusions represent differences between memory processes or memory strength. In the current study, participants were scanned with fMRI during retrieval in a paired-associate task, and a new approach separated the analysis of memory strength from the analysis of memory processes. The data were sorted by confidence level in an old/new task, and the high-confidence responses were compared in categories when associative memory was highly accurate and when it was not available. The results show that high-confidence memory produced increased activity in the hippocampus,relative to the level for forgotten pairs, both when associative memory was available and when it was not. Two interpretations are discussed for the behavioral results for when associative memory was not available: one account based on familiarity and the other account based on noncriterial recollection. The conclusion is that recognition of the word-pairs was based on familiarity when associative memory was not available. Together with the fMRI results that activity in two regions associated with cognitive control (left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and left inferior parietal lobule) was greater when responses were based on associative memory than when based on familiarity, the findings suggest that the hippocampus supports strong memory and that cortical regions make an additional contribution to recollection.
Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20014387     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  19 in total

1.  Distractibility during episodic retrieval is exacerbated by perturbation of left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Peter E Wais; Olivia Y Kim; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Brain mechanisms of successful recognition through retrieval of semantic context.

Authors:  Kristin E Flegal; Alejandro Marín-Gutiérrez; J Daniel Ragland; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Neural correlates of confidence during item recognition and source memory retrieval: evidence for both dual-process and strength memory theories.

Authors:  Scott M Hayes; Norbou Buchler; Jared Stokes; James Kragel; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Age-Related Increases in Tip-of-the-tongue are Distinct from Decreases in Remembering Names: A Functional MRI Study.

Authors:  Willem Huijbers; Kathryn V Papp; Molly LaPoint; Sarah E Wigman; Alex Dagley; Trey Hedden; Dorene M Rentz; Aaron P Schultz; Reisa A Sperling
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Neural mechanisms underlying the impact of visual distraction on retrieval of long-term memory.

Authors:  Peter E Wais; Michael T Rubens; Jacqueline Boccanfuso; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The familiarity/recollection distinction does not illuminate medial temporal lobe function: response to Montaldi and Mayes.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 7.  Brain networks underlying episodic memory retrieval.

Authors:  Michael D Rugg; Kaia L Vilberg
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Effortful retrieval reduces hippocampal activity and impairs incidental encoding.

Authors:  Emilie T Reas; James B Brewer
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 3.899

9.  Memory deficits, gait ataxia and neuronal loss in the hippocampus and cerebellum in mice that are heterozygous for Pur-alpha.

Authors:  Mary F Barbe; Jessica J Krueger; Regina Loomis; Jessica Otte; Jennifer Gordon
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Imbalance of incidental encoding across tasks: an explanation for non-memory-related hippocampal activations?

Authors:  Emilie T Reas; James B Brewer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.