Literature DB >> 20012457

The apes' edge: positional learning in chimpanzees and humans.

Ansgar D Endress1, Sarah Carden, Elisabetta Versace, Marc D Hauser.   

Abstract

A wide variety of organisms produce actions and signals in particular temporal sequences, including the motor actions recruited during tool-mediated foraging, the arrangement of notes in the songs of birds, whales and gibbons, and the patterning of words in human speech. To accurately reproduce such events, the elements that comprise such sequences must be memorized. Both memory and artificial language learning studies have revealed at least two mechanisms for memorizing sequences, one tracking co-occurrence statistics among items in sequences (i.e., transitional probabilities) and the other one tracking the positions of items in sequences, in particular those of items in sequence-edges. The latter mechanism seems to dominate the encoding of sequences after limited exposure, and to be recruited by a wide array of grammatical phenomena. To assess whether humans differ from other species in their reliance on one mechanism over the other after limited exposure, we presented chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human adults with brief exposure to six items, auditory sequences. Each sequence consisted of three distinct sound types (X, A, B), arranged according to two simple temporal rules: the A item always preceded the B item, and the sequence-edges were always occupied by the X item. In line with previous results with human adults, both species primarily encoded positional information from the sequences; that is, they kept track of the items that occurred in the sequence-edges. In contrast, the sensitivity to co-occurrence statistics was much weaker. Our results suggest that a mechanism to spontaneously encode positional information from sequences is present in both chimpanzees and humans and may represent the default in the absence of training and with brief exposure. As many grammatical regularities exhibit properties of this mechanism, it may be recruited by language and constrain the form that certain grammatical regularities take.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20012457     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-009-0299-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  18 in total

1.  Embodied cognitive evolution and the cerebellum.

Authors:  Robert A Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Budgerigars and zebra finches differ in how they generalize in an artificial grammar learning experiment.

Authors:  Michelle J Spierings; Carel Ten Cate
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  A review of research in primate sanctuaries.

Authors:  Stephen R Ross; Jesse G Leinwand
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Bayesian learning and the psychology of rule induction.

Authors:  Ansgar D Endress
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-03-01

5.  Evidence of an evolutionary precursor to human language affixation in a non-human primate.

Authors:  Ansgar D Endress; Donal Cahill; Stefanie Block; Jeffrey Watumull; Marc D Hauser
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Nonhuman primates learn adjacent dependencies but fail to learn nonadjacent dependencies in a statistical learning task with a salient cue.

Authors:  Maisy Englund; Will Whitham; Christopher M Conway; Michael J Beran; David A Washburn
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 7.  Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: an overview.

Authors:  W Tecumseh Fitch; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Targets for a comparative neurobiology of language.

Authors:  Justin T Kiggins; Jordan A Comins; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Front Evol Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-09

9.  Non-adjacent visual dependency learning in chimpanzees.

Authors:  Ruth Sonnweber; Andrea Ravignani; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Action at a distance: dependency sensitivity in a New World primate.

Authors:  Andrea Ravignani; Ruth-Sophie Sonnweber; Nina Stobbe; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.