Literature DB >> 20011719

Canadian Thoracic Society: Presenting a new process for clinical practice guideline production.

Samir Gupta1, Onil K Bhattacharyya, Melissa C Brouwers, Elizabeth A Estey, Margaret B Harrison, Paul Hernandez, Valerie A Palda, Louis-Philippe Boulet.   

Abstract

A key mandate of the Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) is to promote evidence-based respiratory care through clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). To improve the quality and validity of the production, dissemination and implementation of its CPGs, the CTS has revised its guideline process and has created the Canadian Respiratory Guidelines Committee to oversee this process. The present document outlines the basic methodological tools and principles of the new CTS guideline production process. Important features include standard methods for choosing and formulating optimal questions and for finding, appraising, and summarizing the evidence; use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system for rating the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations; use of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation instrument for quality control during and after guideline development and for appraisal of other guidelines; use of the ADAPTE process for adaptation of existing guidelines to the local context; and use of the GuideLine Implementability Appraisal tool to augment implementability of guidelines. The CTS has also committed to develop guidelines in new areas, an annual guideline review cycle, and a new formal process for dissemination and implementation. Ultimately, it is anticipated that these changes will have a significant impact on the quality of care and clinical outcomes of individuals suffering from respiratory diseases across Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20011719      PMCID: PMC2807796          DOI: 10.1155/2009/397818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Respir J        ISSN: 1198-2241            Impact factor:   2.409


  17 in total

1.  Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal.

Authors:  R Grilli; N Magrini; A Penna; G Mura; A Liberati
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-01-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Changing clinical behaviour by making guidelines specific.

Authors:  Susan Michie; Marie Johnston
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-02-07

3.  Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project.

Authors: 
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-02

4.  Ethnic specific recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: a first exploratory comparison between guidelines from the USA, Canada, the UK, and the Netherlands.

Authors:  D R Manna; M A Bruijnzeels; H G A Mokkink; M Berg
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-10

5.  An official ATS statement: grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations.

Authors:  Holger J Schünemann; Roman Jaeschke; Deborah J Cook; William F Bria; Ali A El-Solh; Armin Ernst; Bonnie F Fahy; Michael K Gould; Kathleen L Horan; Jerry A Krishnan; Constantine A Manthous; Janet R Maurer; Walter T McNicholas; Andrew D Oxman; Gordon Rubenfeld; Gerard M Turino; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 6.  ACCP evidence-based guideline development: a successful and transparent approach addressing conflict of interest, funding, and patient-centered recommendations.

Authors:  Michael H Baumann; Sandra Zelman Lewis; David Gutterman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Gunn E Vist; Regina Kunz; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-26

8.  Inside guidelines: comparative analysis of recommendations and evidence in diabetes guidelines from 13 countries.

Authors:  Jako S Burgers; Julia V Bailey; Niek S Klazinga; Akke K Van Der Bij; Richard Grol; Gene Feder
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Improving knowledge transfer on chronic respiratory diseases: a Canadian perspective. How to translate recent advances in respiratory diseases into day-to-day care.

Authors:  L-P Boulet
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.075

10.  How evidence-based are the recommendations in evidence-based guidelines?

Authors:  Finlay A McAlister; Sean van Diepen; Rajdeep S Padwal; Jeffrey A Johnson; Sumit R Majumdar
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  6 in total

1.  Pan-Canadian REspiratory STandards INitiative for Electronic Health Records (PRESTINE): 2011 national forum proceedings.

Authors:  M Diane Lougheed; Janice Minard; Shari Dworkin; Mary-Ann Juurlink; Walley J Temple; Teresa To; Marc Koehn; Anne Van Dam; Louis-Philippe Boulet
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.409

2.  Introducing the Canadian Thoracic Society framework for guideline dissemination and implementation, with concurrent evaluation.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Christopher Licskai; Anne Van Dam; Louis-Philippe Boulet
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.409

Review 3.  10 years of mindlines: a systematic review and commentary.

Authors:  Sietse Wieringa; Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 4.  Guidance for updating clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review of methodological handbooks.

Authors:  Robin W M Vernooij; Andrea Juliana Sanabria; Ivan Solà; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Laura Martínez García
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 5.  Developing a checklist for guideline implementation planning: review and synthesis of guideline development and implementation advice.

Authors:  Anna R Gagliardi; Catherine Marshall; Sue Huckson; Roberta James; Val Moore
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Contemporaneous International Asthma Guidelines Present Differing Recommendations: An Analysis.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Emily Paolucci; Alan Kaplan; Louis-Philippe Boulet
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 2.409

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.