Literature DB >> 20011717

Development and psychometric evaluation of a new measure of pain-related support preferences: the Pain Response Preference Questionnaire.

L A McWilliams1, K M Saldanha, B D Dick, M C Watt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Behavioural conceptualizations of chronic pain posit that solicitous responses to pain behaviours are positively reinforcing and play a role in the development of chronic pain and disability. Recent research suggests that studies investigating this model were likely limited by the use of only a few narrowly defined categories of responses to pain behaviour. A measure of preferences regarding pain-related social support has the potential to improve behavioural models of chronic pain by identifying other potentially reinforcing responses to pain behaviour.
OBJECTIVE: The Pain Response Preference Questionnaire (PRPQ) was created to assess preferences regarding pain-related social support. The purpose of the present study was to empirically develop PRPQ scales and examine their psychometric properties.
METHODS: A large university student sample (n=487) free of chronic pain completed the 39-item PRPQ. Factor analysis was applied to the data from the present sample to empirically develop PRPQ scales. Using a second student sample (n=87), relationships between the PRPQ scales and theoretically related measures were examined to evaluate the construct validity of the scales. Factor analysis supported four factors that reflected preferences for emotional and instrumental support, assistance in managing pain and emotions, having one's pain ignored, and being encouraged to persist with one's activities. Based on this analysis, scales labelled solicitude, management, suppression and encouragement were created. Correlation analyses supported the construct validity of these scales.
CONCLUSIONS: The PRPQ is a psychometrically sound measure of preferences of pain-related social support. Research with clinical samples is needed to further evaluate its psychometric properties and clinical utility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20011717      PMCID: PMC2807774          DOI: 10.1155/2009/429767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Res Manag        ISSN: 1203-6765            Impact factor:   3.037


  21 in total

1.  A RATIONALE AND TEST FOR THE NUMBER OF FACTORS IN FACTOR ANALYSIS.

Authors:  J L HORN
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.

Authors:  D P CROWNE; D MARLOWE
Journal:  J Consult Psychol       Date:  1960-08

3.  Measurement of agency, communion, and emotional vulnerability with the Personal Attributes Questionnaire.

Authors:  L Charles Ward; Beverly E Thorn; Kristi L Clements; Kim E Dixon; Stacy D Sanford
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2006-04

4.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Chronic pain couples: perceived marital interactions and pain behaviours.

Authors:  Toby R Newton-John; Amanda C de C Williams
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Validation evidence for three coping measures.

Authors:  K K Clark; C A Bormann; R S Cropanzano; K James
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  1995-12

7.  Anger management style, hostility and spouse responses: gender differences in predictors of adjustment among chronic pain patients.

Authors:  John W Burns; Barbara J Johnson; Neil Mahoney; James Devine; Ronald Pawl
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  The relationship of adult attachment dimensions to pain-related fear, hypervigilance, and catastrophizing.

Authors:  Lachlan A McWilliams; Gordon J G Asmundson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  The epidemiology of chronic pain in the community.

Authors:  A M Elliott; B H Smith; K I Penny; W C Smith; W A Chambers
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-10-09       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  The role of pain behaviors in the modulation of marital conflict in chronic pain couples.

Authors:  L Schwartz; M A Slater; G R Birchler
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  4 in total

1.  Psychometric evaluation and refinement of the Pain Response Preference Questionnaire.

Authors:  Lachlan A McWilliams; John Kowal; Donald Sharpe; Bruce D Dick
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.037

2.  Associations between adult attachment dimensions and attitudes toward pain behaviour.

Authors:  Lachlan A McWilliams; Paul D J Murphy; S Jeffrey Bailey
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.037

3.  Older adults' preferences for formal social support of autonomy and dependence in pain: development and validation of a scale.

Authors:  Sónia F Bernardes; Marta Matos; Liesbet Goubert
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2017-01-24

4.  I like it when my partner holds my hand: development of the Responses and Attitudes to Support during Pain questionnaire (RASP).

Authors:  Charlotte Krahé; Yannis Paloyelis; Chiara F Sambo; Aikaterini Fotopoulou
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.