Literature DB >> 20011456

Comparison of CAT Item Selection Criteria for Polytomous Items.

Seung W Choi1, Richard J Swartz.   

Abstract

Item selection is a core component in computerized adaptive testing (CAT). Several studies have evaluated new and classical selection methods; however, the few that have applied such methods to the use of polytomous items have reported conflicting results. To clarify these discrepancies and further investigate selection method properties, six different selection methods are compared systematically. The results showed no clear benefit from more sophisticated selection criteria and showed one method previously believed to be superior-the maximum expected posterior weighted information (MEPWI)-to be mathematically equivalent to a simpler method, the maximum posterior weighted information (MPWI).

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20011456      PMCID: PMC2791416          DOI: 10.1177/0146621608327801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0146-6216


  2 in total

1.  Special issues for building computerized-adaptive tests for measuring patient-reported outcomes: the National Institute of Health's investment in new technology.

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment.

Authors:  Jakob Bue Bjorner; Chih-Hung Chang; David Thissen; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 4.147

  2 in total
  31 in total

1.  Content-balancing strategy in bifactor computerized adaptive patient-reported outcome measurement.

Authors:  Yi Zheng; Chih-Hung Chang; Hua-Hua Chang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  How item banks and their application can influence measurement practice in rehabilitation medicine: a PROMIS fatigue item bank example.

Authors:  Jin-Shei Lai; David Cella; Seung Choi; Doerte U Junghaenel; Christopher Christodoulou; Richard Gershon; Arthur Stone
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Ensuring content validity of patient-reported outcomes: a shadow-test approach to their adaptive measurement.

Authors:  Seung W Choi; Wim J van der Linden
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Methodology for developing and evaluating the PROMIS smoking item banks.

Authors:  Mark Hansen; Li Cai; Brian D Stucky; Joan S Tucker; William G Shadel; Maria Orlando Edelen
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  PedsQL Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Module for children, adolescents and young adults: feasibility, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  Kavitha Nutakki; James W Varni; Nancy L Swigonski
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  A comparison of computer adaptive tests (CATs) and short forms in terms of accuracy and number of items administrated using PROMIS profile.

Authors:  Eisuke Segawa; Benjamin Schalet; David Cella
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Utilizing Multidimensional Computer Adaptive Testing to Mitigate Burden With Patient Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Michael Bass; Scott Morris; Richard Neapolitan
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

8.  Validity of PROMIS physical function measured in diverse clinical samples.

Authors:  Benjamin D Schalet; Ron D Hays; Sally E Jensen; Jennifer L Beaumont; James F Fries; David Cella
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Efficiency of static and computer adaptive short forms compared to full-length measures of depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Seung W Choi; Steven P Reise; Paul A Pilkonis; Ron D Hays; David Cella
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Validity and reliability of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system instruments in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Joan E Broderick; Stefan Schneider; Doerte U Junghaenel; Joseph E Schwartz; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.794

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.