Literature DB >> 2001137

Sharing of information by students in an objective structured clinical examination.

P J Rutala1, D B Witzke, E O Leko, J V Fulginiti, P J Taylor.   

Abstract

Increasing numbers of medical schools are using Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) to evaluate students. An Objective Structured Clinical Examination employs a multiple-station format and standardized patients to document students' clinical skills. A lengthy format is necessary; testing an entire class often necessitates multiple repetitions of the same examination. This dictates a need to minimize sharing of information among students. We studied six administrations of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination designed to measure skills. Analyses were conducted to detect changes in scores over the administrations as well as over the 8.5 hours of each day of testing. An increase in either might indicate information sharing had occurred. No significant increase occurred. If information was shared, it had no significant effect on scores. Skills a student uses to approach a patient should not change even if the patient's complaints are known.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2001137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  3 in total

1.  The Objective Structured Clinical Examination and student collusion: marks do not tell the whole truth.

Authors:  R Parks; P M Warren; K M Boyd; H Cameron; A Cumming; G Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  How well do second-year students learn physical diagnosis? Observational study of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).

Authors:  Claus Hamann; Kevin Volkan; Mary B Fishman; Ronald C Silvestri; Steven R Simon; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Order effects in high stakes undergraduate examinations: an analysis of 5 years of administrative data in one UK medical school.

Authors:  Jenni Burt; Gary Abel; Matt Barclay; Robert Evans; John Benson; Mark Gurnell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.