Literature DB >> 20010397

Three-dimensional analysis of the cervical spine kinematics: effect of age and gender in healthy subjects.

Céline Lansade1, Sébastien Laporte, Patricia Thoreux, Marc-Antoine Rousseau, Wafa Skalli, François Lavaste.   

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN.: A three-dimensional (3D) analysis of the cervical spine kinematics in vivo about a large asymptomatic database in order to evaluate the impact of age and gender on the neck's performances. OBJECTIVE.: To investigate the effect of age and gender on kinematical parameters of the cervical spine, specifically quantitative parameters concerning coupled movements and proprioception, using the infra-red POLARIS measurement system. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Cervical spine kinematics has been investigated in vivo by numerous authors using various devices. However, few is known about the influence of gender and age on the 3D cervical biomechanics, specifically regarding coupled movements and proprioceptive abilities. METHODS.: A total of 140 asymptomatic volunteers (70 men and 70 women) aged 20 to 93 years old were enrolled. The noninvasive infrared system Polaris was used to quantify the 3D range of motion (ROM) of cervical spine and to evaluate proprioceptive abilities. For validating the protocol in terms of reproducibility, 12 volunteers were tested 3 times by 2 independent operators. RESULTS.: The standard error of measurement for the maximal ROM in the 3 space planes was 5%. Gender had no significant influence on the 3D cervical ROM, except for the "70-79 years old" group. Age had a significant influence on all main movements showing 0.55 degrees to 0.79 degrees magnitude decrease per decade. Age and gender had no significant influence on coupled movements. "Head-to-Target" proprioception was significantly affected by the age only in the horizontal plane. CONCLUSION.: A data base for cervical ROM, pattern of motion, and proprioceptive capability was established in population of 140 healthy subjects of various age and gender. Significant age-related decrease in ROM and proprioceptive abilities were observed in this study. Coupled movements did not vary with gender or age; however, their role in the cervical performance increased with age since main movements were limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20010397     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b4f667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  10 in total

1.  Cervical range of motion and strength in 4,293 young male adults with chronic neck pain.

Authors:  Max Daniel Kauther; Michael Piotrowski; Bjoern Hussmann; Sven Lendemans; Christian Wedemeyer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Influence of movement speed on cervical range of motion.

Authors:  Bruno Bonnechère; Patrick Salvia; Pierre-Michel Dugailly; Laura Maroye; Bernard Van Geyt; Véronique Feipel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Effects of orthoses on three-dimensional load-displacement properties of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Paul C Ivancic
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Evidence for a general stiffening motor control pattern in neck pain: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Ingebrigt Meisingset; Astrid Woodhouse; Ann-Katrin Stensdotter; Øyvind Stavdahl; Håvard Lorås; Sigmund Gismervik; Hege Andresen; Kristian Austreim; Ottar Vasseljen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Sensorimotor function of the cervical spine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Neil J Artz; Michael A Adams; Patricia Dolan
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Influence of Cervical Spine Mobility on the Focal and Postural Components of the Sit-to-Stand Task.

Authors:  Alain Hamaoui; Caroline Alamini-Rodrigues
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  An Attempt of Early Detection of Poor Outcome after Whiplash.

Authors:  Sebastien Laporte; Danping Wang; Jennyfer Lecompte; Sophie Blancho; Baptiste Sandoz; Antoine Feydy; Pavel Lindberg; Julien Adrian; Elodie Chiarovano; Catherine de Waele; Pierre-Paul Vidal
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Sex-Specific Intubation Biomechanics: Intubation Forces Are Greater in Male Than in Female Patients, Independent of Body Weight.

Authors:  Bradley J Hindman; Franklin Dexter; Benjamin C Gadomski; Martin J Bucx
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-06-21

9.  Comparison of proprioceptive acuity of the cervical spine in healthy adults and adults with chronic non-specific low back pain: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Maria Emmert; Corina Schuster-Amft; Eling D de Bruin; Michael A McCaskey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Upper cervical range of rotation during the flexion-rotation test is age dependent: an observational study.

Authors:  Axel Georg Meender Schäfer; Thomas Schöttker-Königer; Toby Maxwell Hall; Ilias Mavroidis; Christoph Roeben; Martina Schneider; Yorick Wild; Kerstin Lüdtke
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 5.346

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.