Literature DB >> 2001012

Water hydrogen incorporation into body fat in pigs: effect on double/triple-labeled water method.

P Haggarty1, B A McGaw, M F Fuller, S L Christie, W W Wong.   

Abstract

A basic assumption of the doubly labeled water (DLW) and triply labeled water (TLW) methods for measuring water flux (rH2O), CO2 production (rCO2), and fractionated water loss (X) is that the H of body water only leaves the body as water. Any loss of isotopes in other products will introduce an error into these techniques. The body fat represents the largest potential sink for water H. 2H sequestration into the carcass fatty acids was investigated in eight pigs labeled with 2H2O for 21 days. rCO2 was measured simultaneously in respiration chambers to allow an accurate assessment of the effect of 2H sequestration on the estimated rCO2. The fat content of the diet (1.63%), level of intake, and stage of maturity were all designed to give the widest possible range of sequestration effects. Four animals were restricted to their estimated maintenance requirement and four were allowed to feed ad libitum giving a range of weight gain from 100 to 650 g/day. This was reflected in the estimated error on rH2O (+0.42% in the restricted group and +2.52% in the fast-growing animals) and on rCO2 (-1.30 and -7.59%, respectively). The error on the calculation of X using TLW was +0.03 units in the restricted group and +0.20 units in the fast-growing animals. The error of +0.2 on X propagates through to an underestimate of rCO2 of approximately 4%, and since this is additive with the error on DLW the ultimate error on rCO2 using TLW would be approximately -12%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2001012     DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.1991.260.3.R627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  5 in total

1.  Energetics of lactation in harp seals (Phoca groenlandica) from the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada.

Authors:  C Lydersen; K M Kovacs
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Methodologic considerations for measuring energy expenditure differences between diets varying in carbohydrate using the doubly labeled water method.

Authors:  Kevin D Hall; Juen Guo; Kong Y Chen; Rudolph L Leibel; Marc L Reitman; Michael Rosenbaum; Steven R Smith; Eric Ravussin
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Effects of a low carbohydrate diet on energy expenditure during weight loss maintenance: randomized trial.

Authors:  Cara B Ebbeling; Henry A Feldman; Gloria L Klein; Julia M W Wong; Lisa Bielak; Sarah K Steltz; Patricia K Luoto; Robert R Wolfe; William W Wong; David S Ludwig
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-11-14

4.  Energy expenditure and body composition changes after an isocaloric ketogenic diet in overweight and obese men: A secondary analysis of energy expenditure and physical activity.

Authors:  Mark I Friedman; Scott Appel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Energy expenditure in chow-fed female non-human primates of various weights.

Authors:  Russell Rising; Maxim Signaevsky; Leonard A Rosenblum; John G Kral; Fima Lifshitz
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 4.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.