INTRODUCTION: Loss of E-cadherin confers a poor prognosis in lung cancer patients and is associated with in vitro resistance to endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors. Zinc finger E box-binding homeobox (ZEB)-1, the predominant transcriptional suppressor of E-cadherin in lung tumor lines, recruits histone deacetylases (HDACs) as co-repressors. METHODS: NSCLC cell lines were treated with HDAC inhibitors and analyzed for E-cadherin induction, growth inhibition and apoptosis. National Cancer Institute-H157 cells expressing ectopic E-cadherin were tested for tumorigenicity in murine xenografts. RESULTS: We found that treatment with MS-275, compared to vorinostat (SAHA), valproic acid or trichostatin A, was most effective in E-cadherin up-regulation and persistence in non-small cell lung cancers. As with other tumor types and HDAC inhibitors, MS-275 inhibited growth and induced apoptosis. Importantly, blocking E-cadherin induction by short hairpin RNA resulted in less inhibition by MS-275, implicating the epithelial to mesenchymal phenotype process as a contributing factor. In contrast to H460 and H661, H157 cells were resistant to E-cadherin up-regulation by HDAC inhibitors. However, E-cadherin was restored, in a synergistic manner, by combined knockdown of ZEB-1 and ZEB-2. In addition, H157 cells stably transfected with E-cadherin were markedly attenuated in their tumor forming ability. Lastly, combining MS-275 with the microtubule stabilizing agent, paclitaxel, or 17-(allylamino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin, a heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, resulted in synergistic growth inhibition. Since MS-275 has no reported activity against HDAC6, which regulates both microtubule and heat shock protein 90 functions, other mechanisms of synergy are anticipated. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the role of ZEB proteins and HDAC inhibitors in the pathogenesis and treatment of lung cancer.
INTRODUCTION: Loss of E-cadherin confers a poor prognosis in lung cancerpatients and is associated with in vitro resistance to endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors. Zinc finger E box-binding homeobox (ZEB)-1, the predominant transcriptional suppressor of E-cadherin in lung tumor lines, recruits histone deacetylases (HDACs) as co-repressors. METHODS:NSCLC cell lines were treated with HDAC inhibitors and analyzed for E-cadherin induction, growth inhibition and apoptosis. National Cancer Institute-H157 cells expressing ectopic E-cadherin were tested for tumorigenicity in murine xenografts. RESULTS: We found that treatment with MS-275, compared to vorinostat (SAHA), valproic acid or trichostatin A, was most effective in E-cadherin up-regulation and persistence in non-small cell lung cancers. As with other tumor types and HDAC inhibitors, MS-275 inhibited growth and induced apoptosis. Importantly, blocking E-cadherin induction by short hairpin RNA resulted in less inhibition by MS-275, implicating the epithelial to mesenchymal phenotype process as a contributing factor. In contrast to H460 and H661, H157 cells were resistant to E-cadherin up-regulation by HDAC inhibitors. However, E-cadherin was restored, in a synergistic manner, by combined knockdown of ZEB-1 and ZEB-2. In addition, H157 cells stably transfected with E-cadherin were markedly attenuated in their tumor forming ability. Lastly, combining MS-275 with the microtubule stabilizing agent, paclitaxel, or 17-(allylamino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin, a heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, resulted in synergistic growth inhibition. Since MS-275 has no reported activity against HDAC6, which regulates both microtubule and heat shock protein 90 functions, other mechanisms of synergy are anticipated. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the role of ZEB proteins and HDAC inhibitors in the pathogenesis and treatment of lung cancer.
Authors: Melissa J Peart; Gordon K Smyth; Ryan K van Laar; David D Bowtell; Victoria M Richon; Paul A Marks; Andrew J Holloway; Ricky W Johnstone Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-02-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Chunrong Yu; Bret B Friday; Jin-Ping Lai; Andrea McCollum; Peter Atadja; Lewis R Roberts; Alex A Adjei Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-02-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Suresh S Ramalingam; Robert A Parise; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Ramesh K Ramananthan; Theodore F Lagattuta; Lori A Musguire; Ronald G Stoller; Douglas M Potter; Athanassios E Argiris; James A Zwiebel; Merrill J Egorin; Chandra P Belani Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-05-17 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Liang Qiao; Gregory E Tasian; Haiyang Zhang; Mei Cao; Max Ferretti; Gerald R Cunha; Laurence S Baskin Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2012-01-06 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Robert M Gemmill; Joëlle Roche; Vincent A Potiron; Patrick Nasarre; Michael Mitas; Chris D Coldren; Barbara A Helfrich; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Paul A Bunn; Harry A Drabkin Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2010-10-25 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: David H Peng; Samrat T Kundu; Jared J Fradette; Lixia Diao; Pan Tong; Lauren A Byers; Jing Wang; Jaime Rodriguez Canales; Pamela A Villalobos; Barbara Mino; Yanan Yang; Rosalba Minelli; Michael D Peoples; Christopher A Bristow; Timothy P Heffernan; Alessandro Carugo; Ignacio I Wistuba; Don L Gibbons Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2019-03-13 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Lyndsay V Rhodes; Chandra R Tate; H Chris Segar; Hope E Burks; Theresa B Phamduy; Van Hoang; Steven Elliott; Diari Gilliam; F Nell Pounder; Muralidharan Anbalagan; Douglas B Chrisey; Brian G Rowan; Matthew E Burow; Bridgette M Collins-Burow Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Wei Liao; Gwen Jordaan; Minu K Srivastava; Steven Dubinett; Sherven Sharma; Sanjai Sharma Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 6.166