Literature DB >> 20009895

Early cervical cancer managed by laparoscopy and conventional surgery: comparison of treatment results.

Piotr Sobiczewski1, Mariusz Bidzinski, Pawel Derlatka, Grzegorz Panek, Anna Danska-Bidzinska, Leszek Gmyrek, Wojciech Michalski.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The goal of this retrospective analysis was to compare the results of treatment in patients with early cervical cancer managed by laparoscopy with those for patients observed after laparotomy.
METHODS: The retrospective analysis was carried out with 22 patients operated on with total laparoscopic hysterectomy and 58 patients treated by abdominal hysterectomy. Patients with clinical tumor stage IA, IB1, or IIA were eligible for surgery. The main efficacy end point was disease-free survival evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The survival curves were compared using log-rank tests. In addition, length of hospitalization, duration of surgery, and complication rate were compared. P < 0.05 was set as statistically significant.
RESULTS: Predicted 3-year disease-free survival rates in the "open surgery" and "laparoscopy" groups were 0.86 (standard deviation [SD], 0.049) and 0.82 (SD, 0.098), respectively (P = 0.53). Recurrence rate was 13.6% after laparoscopy and 12% in open surgery. In 2 patients, intraperitoneal spread occurred after laparoscopy. The operation time was longer and hospitalization shorter after laparoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: The 3-year disease-free survival was similar in both groups. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy may be an option in early cervical cancer; however, the intraperitoneal spread in 2 patients compels a search for possible risk factors in patients managed by laparoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20009895     DOI: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181ba5e88

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  13 in total

1.  Laparoscopic surgery is a current tide of widely accepted standard procedure for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Suh; Jae Weon Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 4.401

2.  Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Roni Nitecki; Pedro T Ramirez; Michael Frumovitz; Kate J Krause; Ana I Tergas; Jason D Wright; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Alexander Melamed
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  Single-port access laparoscopic staging operation for a borderline ovarian tumor.

Authors:  Aera Yoon; Tae-Joong Kim; Woo Seok Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim; Duk-Soo Bae
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 4.401

4.  Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy has higher risk of perioperative urologic complication than abdominal radical hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of 38 studies.

Authors:  Jong Ha Hwang; Bo Wook Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for low-risk cervical cancer: a multicentre retrospective study.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Li; Chunlin Chen; Ping Liu; Anwei Lu; Hongwei Zhao; Xuemei Zhan; Hui Duan; Pengfei Li; Weidong Zhao; Jilong Yao; Donglin Li; Haixia Jiang; Mubiao Liu; Xiaonong Bin; Jinghe Lang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Clinical observation of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Xiang-Hua Yin; Zhong-Qin Wang; Shi-Zhang Yang; Hong-Yan Jia; Min Shi
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-05-15

7.  Radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy.

Authors:  Sarah E Taylor; William C McBee; Scott D Richard; Robert P Edwards
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Various types of total laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomies and their effects on bladder function.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kanao; Kazuko Fujiwara; Keiko Ebisawa; Tomonori Hada; Yoshiaki Ota; Masaaki Andou
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.401

9.  Impact of hospital care volume on clinical outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Banghyun Lee; Kidong Kim; Youngmi Park; Myong Cheol Lim; Robert E Bristow
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Prognostic and Safety Roles in Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tiefeng Cao; Yanling Feng; Qidan Huang; Ting Wan; Jihong Liu
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 1.878

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.