OBJECTIVE: Whereas most septic patients have an underlying comorbidity, most animal models of sepsis use mice that were healthy before the onset of infection. Malignancy is the most common comorbidity associated with sepsis. The purpose of this study was to determine whether mice with cancer have a different response to sepsis than healthy animals. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized controlled study. SETTING: Animal laboratory in a university medical center. SUBJECTS: C57Bl/6 mice. INTERVENTIONS: Animals received a subcutaneous injection of either 250,000 cells of the transplantable pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line Pan02 (cancer) or phosphate-buffered saline (healthy). Three weeks later, mice given Pan02 cells had reproducible, nonmetastatic tumors. Both groups of mice then underwent intratracheal injection of either Pseudomonas aeruginosa (septic) or 0.9% NaCl (sham). Animals were killed 24 hrs postoperatively or followed-up 7 days for survival. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mice with cancer and healthy mice appeared similar when subjected to sham operation, although cancer animals had lower levels of T- and B-lymphocyte apoptosis. Septic mice with cancer had increased mortality compared to previously healthy septic mice subjected to the identical injury (52% vs. 28%; p = .04). This was associated with increased bacteremia but no difference in local pulmonary infection. Septic mice with cancer also had increased intestinal epithelial apoptosis. Although sepsis induced an increase in T- and B-lymphocyte apoptosis in all animals, septic mice with cancer had decreased T- and B-lymphocyte apoptosis compared to previously healthy septic mice. Serum and pulmonary cytokines, lung histology, complete blood counts, and intestinal proliferation were similar between septic mice with cancer and previously healthy septic mice. CONCLUSIONS: When subjected to the same septic insult, mice with cancer have increased mortality compared to previously healthy animals. Decreased systemic bacterial clearance and alterations in intestinal epithelial and lymphocyte apoptosis may help explain this differential response.
OBJECTIVE: Whereas most septicpatients have an underlying comorbidity, most animal models of sepsis use mice that were healthy before the onset of infection. Malignancy is the most common comorbidity associated with sepsis. The purpose of this study was to determine whether mice with cancer have a different response to sepsis than healthy animals. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized controlled study. SETTING: Animal laboratory in a university medical center. SUBJECTS: C57Bl/6 mice. INTERVENTIONS: Animals received a subcutaneous injection of either 250,000 cells of the transplantable pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line Pan02 (cancer) or phosphate-buffered saline (healthy). Three weeks later, mice given Pan02 cells had reproducible, nonmetastatic tumors. Both groups of mice then underwent intratracheal injection of either Pseudomonas aeruginosa (septic) or 0.9% NaCl (sham). Animals were killed 24 hrs postoperatively or followed-up 7 days for survival. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Mice with cancer and healthy mice appeared similar when subjected to sham operation, although cancer animals had lower levels of T- and B-lymphocyte apoptosis. Septicmice with cancer had increased mortality compared to previously healthy septicmice subjected to the identical injury (52% vs. 28%; p = .04). This was associated with increased bacteremia but no difference in local pulmonary infection. Septicmice with cancer also had increased intestinal epithelial apoptosis. Although sepsis induced an increase in T- and B-lymphocyte apoptosis in all animals, septicmice with cancer had decreased T- and B-lymphocyte apoptosis compared to previously healthy septicmice. Serum and pulmonary cytokines, lung histology, complete blood counts, and intestinal proliferation were similar between septicmice with cancer and previously healthy septicmice. CONCLUSIONS: When subjected to the same septic insult, mice with cancer have increased mortality compared to previously healthy animals. Decreased systemic bacterial clearance and alterations in intestinal epithelial and lymphocyte apoptosis may help explain this differential response.
Authors: Isaiah R Turnbull; Timothy G Buchman; Pardis Javadi; Cheryl A Woolsey; Richard S Hotchkiss; Irene E Karl; Craig M Coopersmith Journal: Shock Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Craig M Coopersmith; Katherine C Chang; Paul E Swanson; Kevin W Tinsley; Paul E Stromberg; Timothy G Buchman; Irene E Karl; Richard S Hotchkiss Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Craig M Coopersmith; Paul E Stromberg; W Michael Dunne; Christopher G Davis; Daniel M Amiot; Timothy G Buchman; Irene E Karl; Richard S Hotchkiss Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-04-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Craig M Coopersmith; Paul E Stromberg; Christopher G Davis; W Michael Dunne; Daniel M Amiot; Irene E Karl; Richard S Hotchkiss; Timothy G Buchman Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: David J van Westerloo; Marcus J Schultz; Marco J Bruno; Alex F de Vos; Sandrine Florquin; Tom van der Poll Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Pardis Javadi; Timothy G Buchman; Paul E Stromberg; Kareem D Husain; W Michael Dunne; Cheryl A Woolsey; Isaiah R Turnbull; Richard S Hotchkiss; Irene E Karl; Craig M Coopersmith Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Robert J Feezor; Caroline Oberholzer; Henry V Baker; Daniela Novick; Menachem Rubinstein; Lyle L Moldawer; John Pribble; Sonia Souza; Charles A Dinarello; Wolfgang Ertel; Andreas Oberholzer Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Ursula Bommhardt; Katherine C Chang; Paul E Swanson; Tracey H Wagner; Kevin W Tinsley; Irene E Karl; Richard S Hotchkiss Journal: J Immunol Date: 2004-06-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Mark D Williams; Lee Ann Braun; Liesl M Cooper; Joseph Johnston; Richard V Weiss; Rebecca L Qualy; Walter Linde-Zwirble Journal: Crit Care Date: 2004-07-05 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Erin E Perrone; Enjae Jung; Elise Breed; Jessica A Dominguez; Zhe Liang; Andrew T Clark; W Michael Dunne; Eileen M Burd; Craig M Coopersmith Journal: Shock Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: John D Lyons; Ching-Wen Chen; Zhe Liang; Wenxiao Zhang; Deena B Chihade; Eileen M Burd; Alton B Farris; Mandy L Ford; Craig M Coopersmith Journal: Shock Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Amy C Fox; Elise R Breed; Zhe Liang; Andrew T Clark; Brendan R Zee-Cheng; Katherine C Chang; Jessica A Dominguez; Enjae Jung; W Michael Dunne; Eileen M Burd; Alton B Farris; David C Linehan; Craig M Coopersmith Journal: J Immunol Date: 2011-07-06 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Rohit Mittal; Ching-Wen Chen; John D Lyons; Lindsay M Margoles; Zhe Liang; Craig M Coopersmith; Mandy L Ford Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Jessica A Dominguez; Paul J Vithayathil; Ludmila Khailova; Christopher P Lawrance; Alexandr J Samocha; Enjae Jung; Ann M Leathersich; W Michael Dunne; Craig M Coopersmith Journal: Shock Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Amy C Fox; Kevin W McConnell; Benyam P Yoseph; Elise Breed; Zhe Liang; Andrew T Clark; David O'Donnell; Brendan Zee-Cheng; Enjae Jung; Jessica A Dominguez; W Michael Dunne; Eileen M Burd; Craig M Coopersmith Journal: Shock Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 3.454