UNLABELLED: We recently demonstrated that (11)C-MePPEP, a PET ligand for CB(1) receptors, has such high uptake in the human brain that it can be imaged for 210 min and that receptor density can be quantified as distribution volume (V(T)) using the gold standard of compartmental modeling. However, (11)C-MePPEP had relatively poor retest and intersubject variabilities, which were likely caused by errors in the measurements of radioligand in plasma at low concentrations by 120 min. We sought to find an analog of (11)C-MePPEP that would provide more accurate plasma measurements. We evaluated several promising analogs in the monkey brain and chose the (18)F-di-deutero fluoromethoxy analog ((18)F-FMPEP-d(2)) to evaluate further in the human brain. METHODS: (11)C-FMePPEP, (18)F-FEPEP, (18)F-FMPEP, and (18)F-FMPEP-d(2) were studied in 5 monkeys with 10 PET scans. We calculated V(T) using compartmental modeling with serial measurements of unchanged parent radioligand in arterial plasma and radioactivity in the brain. Nonspecific binding was determined by administering a receptor-saturating dose of rimonabant, an inverse agonist at the CB(1) receptor. Nine healthy human subjects participated in 17 PET scans using (18)F-FMPEP-d(2), with 8 subjects having 2 PET scans to assess retest variability. To identify sources of error, we compared intersubject and retest variability of brain uptake, arterial plasma measurements, and V(T). RESULTS: (18)F-FMPEP-d(2) had high uptake in the monkey brain, with greater than 80% specific binding, and yielded less radioactivity uptake in bone than did (18)F-FMPEP. High brain uptake with (18)F-FMPEP-d(2) was also observed in humans, in whom V(T) was well identified within approximately 60 min. Retest variability of plasma measurements was good (16%); consequently, V(T) had a good retest variability (14%), intersubject variability (26%), and intraclass correlation coefficient (0.89). V(T) increased after 120 min, suggesting an accumulation of radiometabolites in the brain. Radioactivity accumulated in the skull throughout the entire scan but was thought to be an insignificant source of data contamination. CONCLUSION: Studies in monkeys facilitated our development and selection of (18)F-FMPEP-d(2), compared with (18)F-FMPEP, as a radioligand demonstrating high brain uptake, high percentage of specific binding, and reduced uptake in bone. Retest analysis in human subjects showed that (18)F-FMPEP-d(2) has greater precision and accuracy than (11)C-MePPEP, allowing smaller sample sizes to detect a significant difference between groups.
UNLABELLED: We recently demonstrated that (11)C-MePPEP, a PET ligand for CB(1) receptors, has such high uptake in the human brain that it can be imaged for 210 min and that receptor density can be quantified as distribution volume (V(T)) using the gold standard of compartmental modeling. However, (11)C-MePPEP had relatively poor retest and intersubject variabilities, which were likely caused by errors in the measurements of radioligand in plasma at low concentrations by 120 min. We sought to find an analog of (11)C-MePPEP that would provide more accurate plasma measurements. We evaluated several promising analogs in the monkey brain and chose the (18)F-di-deutero fluoromethoxy analog ((18)F-FMPEP-d(2)) to evaluate further in the human brain. METHODS: (11)C-FMePPEP, (18)F-FEPEP, (18)F-FMPEP, and (18)F-FMPEP-d(2) were studied in 5 monkeys with 10 PET scans. We calculated V(T) using compartmental modeling with serial measurements of unchanged parent radioligand in arterial plasma and radioactivity in the brain. Nonspecific binding was determined by administering a receptor-saturating dose of rimonabant, an inverse agonist at the CB(1) receptor. Nine healthy human subjects participated in 17 PET scans using (18)F-FMPEP-d(2), with 8 subjects having 2 PET scans to assess retest variability. To identify sources of error, we compared intersubject and retest variability of brain uptake, arterial plasma measurements, and V(T). RESULTS: (18)F-FMPEP-d(2) had high uptake in the monkey brain, with greater than 80% specific binding, and yielded less radioactivity uptake in bone than did (18)F-FMPEP. High brain uptake with (18)F-FMPEP-d(2) was also observed in humans, in whom V(T) was well identified within approximately 60 min. Retest variability of plasma measurements was good (16%); consequently, V(T) had a good retest variability (14%), intersubject variability (26%), and intraclass correlation coefficient (0.89). V(T) increased after 120 min, suggesting an accumulation of radiometabolites in the brain. Radioactivity accumulated in the skull throughout the entire scan but was thought to be an insignificant source of data contamination. CONCLUSION: Studies in monkeys facilitated our development and selection of (18)F-FMPEP-d(2), compared with (18)F-FMPEP, as a radioligand demonstrating high brain uptake, high percentage of specific binding, and reduced uptake in bone. Retest analysis in human subjects showed that (18)F-FMPEP-d(2) has greater precision and accuracy than (11)C-MePPEP, allowing smaller sample sizes to detect a significant difference between groups.
Authors: Robert B Innis; Vincent J Cunningham; Jacques Delforge; Masahiro Fujita; Albert Gjedde; Roger N Gunn; James Holden; Sylvain Houle; Sung-Cheng Huang; Masanori Ichise; Hidehiro Iida; Hiroshi Ito; Yuichi Kimura; Robert A Koeppe; Gitte M Knudsen; Juhani Knuuti; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Marc Laruelle; Jean Logan; Ralph Paul Maguire; Mark A Mintun; Evan D Morris; Ramin Parsey; Julie C Price; Mark Slifstein; Vesna Sossi; Tetsuya Suhara; John R Votaw; Dean F Wong; Richard E Carson Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2007-05-09 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Garth E Terry; Jeih-San Liow; Sami S Zoghbi; Jussi Hirvonen; Amanda G Farris; Alicja Lerner; Johannes T Tauscher; John M Schaus; Lee Phebus; Christian C Felder; Cheryl L Morse; Jinsoo S Hong; Victor W Pike; Christer Halldin; Robert B Innis Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Magnus Schou; Christer Halldin; Judit Sóvágó; Victor W Pike; Håkan Hall; Balázs Gulyás; P David Mozley; David Dobson; E Shchukin; Robert B Innis; Lars Farde Journal: Synapse Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 2.562
Authors: Sami S Zoghbi; H Umesha Shetty; Masanori Ichise; Masahiro Fujita; Masao Imaizumi; Jeih-San Liow; Jay Shah; John L Musachio; Victor W Pike; Robert B Innis Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: H Donald Burns; Koen Van Laere; Sandra Sanabria-Bohórquez; Terence G Hamill; Guy Bormans; Wai-si Eng; Ray Gibson; Christine Ryan; Brett Connolly; Shil Patel; Stephen Krause; Amy Vanko; Anne Van Hecken; Patrick Dupont; Inge De Lepeleire; Paul Rothenberg; S Aubrey Stoch; Josee Cote; William K Hagmann; James P Jewell; Linus S Lin; Ping Liu; Mark T Goulet; Keith Gottesdiener; John A Wagner; Jan de Hoon; Luc Mortelmans; Tung M Fong; Richard J Hargreaves Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-05-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: J Hirvonen; P Zanotti-Fregonara; J C Umhau; D T George; D Rallis-Frutos; C H Lyoo; C-T Li; C S Hines; H Sun; G E Terry; C Morse; S S Zoghbi; V W Pike; R B Innis; M Heilig Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Marc D Normandin; Ming-Qiang Zheng; Kuo-Shyan Lin; N Scott Mason; Shu-Fei Lin; Jim Ropchan; David Labaree; Shannan Henry; Wendol A Williams; Richard E Carson; Alexander Neumeister; Yiyun Huang Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara; Sami S Zoghbi; Jeih-San Liow; Elise Luong; Ronald Boellaard; Robert L Gladding; Victor W Pike; Robert B Innis; Masahiro Fujita Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Garth E Terry; Jussi Hirvonen; Jeih-San Liow; Nicholas Seneca; Johannes T Tauscher; John M Schaus; Lee Phebus; Christian C Felder; Cheryl L Morse; Victor W Pike; Christer Halldin; Robert B Innis Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-03-24 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Xiaofeng Bao; Shuiyu Lu; Jeih-San Liow; Sami S Zoghbi; Kimberly J Jenko; David T Clark; Robert L Gladding; Robert B Innis; Victor W Pike Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Stal Shrestha; Prachi Singh; Michelle Y Cortes-Salva; Kimberly J Jenko; Masamichi Ikawa; Min-Jeong Kim; Masato Kobayashi; Cheryl L Morse; Robert L Gladding; Jeih-San Liow; Sami S Zoghbi; Masahiro Fujita; Robert B Innis; Victor W Pike Journal: ACS Chem Neurosci Date: 2018-06-13 Impact factor: 4.418
Authors: Sandra Marina Sanabria-Bohórquez; Terence G Hamill; Karolien Goffin; Inge De Lepeleire; Guy Bormans; H Donald Burns; Koen Van Laere Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-12-24 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Jussi Hirvonen; Garth E Terry; Christer Halldin; Victor W Pike; Robert B Innis Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Domokos Máthé; Ildikó Horváth; Krisztián Szigeti; Sean R Donohue; Victor W Pike; Zisheng Jia; Catherine Ledent; Miklós Palkovits; Tamás F Freund; Christer Halldin; Balázs Gulyás Journal: Brain Res Bull Date: 2013-01-11 Impact factor: 4.077