Literature DB >> 20008359

Ecophysiological response of Adelie penguins facing an experimental increase in breeding constraints.

M Beaulieu1, M Spée, D Lazin, Y Ropert-Coudert, Y le Maho, A Ancel, T Raclot.   

Abstract

Foraging strategies play a key role in breeding effort. Little is known, however, about their connection with hormonal and nutritional states, especially when breeding constraints vary. Here, we experimentally increased foraging costs and thus breeding constraints by handicapping Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) with dummy devices representing 3-4% of the penguins' cross-sectional area. We examined food-related stress (via plasma corticosterone concentration) and nutritional state (via metabolite levels). Concurrently, we investigated the use of ecological niches via the isotopic signature of red blood cells indicating the trophic position (delta(15)N) and the spatial distribution (delta(13)C) of penguins. Handicapped birds performed approximately 70% longer foraging trips and lost approximately 60% more body mass than controls and their partners. However, corticosterone levels and the nutritional state were unchanged. The isotopic signature revealed that males and females differed in their foraging behaviour: upper trophic levels contributed more in the males' diet, who foraged in more pelagic areas. Handicapped and partner birds adopted the same strategy at sea: a shift towards higher delta(13)C values suggested that they foraged in more coastal areas than controls. This change in foraging decisions may optimize feeding time by decreasing travelling time. This may partly compensate for the presumed lower foraging efficiency of handicapped birds and for the energetic debt of their partners who had to fast approximately 70% longer on the nest. We propose that this flexible use of ecological niches may allow birds facing increased breeding constraints to avoid chronic stress and to minimize the impact on their body condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20008359     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.035378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  3 in total

1.  Parents are a drag: long-lived birds share the cost of increased foraging effort with their offspring, but males pass on more of the costs than females.

Authors:  Shoshanah R Jacobs; Kyle Hamish Elliott; Anthony J Gaston
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Evaluating the impact of handling and logger attachment on foraging parameters and physiology in southern rockhopper penguins.

Authors:  Katrin Ludynia; Nina Dehnhard; Maud Poisbleau; Laurent Demongin; Juan F Masello; Petra Quillfeldt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Offspring pay sooner, parents pay later: experimental manipulation of body mass reveals trade-offs between immune function, reproduction and survival.

Authors:  Arne Hegemann; Kevin D Matson; Heiner Flinks; B Irene Tieleman
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.172

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.