Literature DB >> 20008151

Views on treatment necessity, harm, and benefits in patients using statins.

Per Lytsy1, Gunilla Burell, Ragnar Westerling.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with dyslipidemia and high overall risk of ischemic heart disease are those most likely to benefit from treatment with statins. The objective of this study was to investigate patients' views of the necessity, harm, and expected benefits of their statin treatment, as well as factors associated with these treatment beliefs. One main objective was to investigate whether cardiovascular risk level and previous coronary heart disease affect the way patients view these different aspects of their medication.
METHODS: A total of 829 statin users were recruited while visiting a pharmacy to collect their statin medication (response rate, 69.4%). Patients returned a questionnaire assessing their medical history, concurrent risk status, social demographic factors, as well as their views and expectations regarding their statin treatment.
RESULTS: Previous ischemic heart disease, or high risk of such disease, was not associated with a more favorable notion on statin treatment. Having an internal health locus of control as well as being satisfied with the physician's treatment explanation were factors associated with more positive views on expected treatment effect. The views on necessity, harm, and treatment benefit were closely associated with each other.
CONCLUSION: The main findings in this study suggest that cardiovascular risk level and previous coronary heart disease are not associated with the way patients value potential benefits of statin treatment. Patients' views of the treatment's necessity, harm, and benefits do not seem to be independent dimensions of patient beliefs but rather represent one overall question: is this good for me?

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20008151     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X09353196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  3 in total

1.  Uncertainty and equipoise: at interplay between epistemology, decision making and ethics.

Authors:  Benjamin Djulbegovic
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.378

2.  Using quantitative risk information in decisions about statins: a qualitative study in a community setting.

Authors:  Louisa Polak; Judith Green
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Dealing with being prescribed cardiovascular preventive medication: a narrative analysis of qualitative interviews with patients with recent acute coronary heart disease in Sweden.

Authors:  Josabeth Hultberg; Staffan Nilsson; Carl Edvard Rudebeck; Anita Kärner Köhler
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.