Literature DB >> 20008093

First-line DMARD choice in early rheumatoid arthritis--do prognostic factors play a role?

Satish M Rachapalli1, Richard Williams, David A Walsh, Adam Young, Patrick D W Kiely, Ernest H Choy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine if prognostic factors predict the choice of first DMARD for patients with RA.
METHODS: Details of 616 patients with early RA were collected from 16 centres in the UK Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Network (ERAN). Logistic regression was used to identify whether HAQ score, swollen joint count (SJC), nodules, RF, ESR, CRP and erosions on radiographs were associated with the choice of first DMARD treatment.
RESULTS: Of 616 patients, 547 (88%) were started on a DMARD, 253 (46%) on MTX, 230 (42%) on SSZ, 47 (9%) on other DMARD monotherapies and 17 (3%) on combination DMARD therapy (CoT). SSZ was started less frequently in patients with positive RF (P = 0.018; OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.38, 0.91) and high SJC (P = 0.02; OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.91, 0.99). MTX was favoured in patients with high SJC (P = 0.002; OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.02, 1.11). Non-prescription of DMARDs was associated with old age (P = 0.02; OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.96, 0.99) and low HAQ score (P = 0.009; OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.68, 0.95). None of the variables predicted CoT. All other variables and the hospital where the patient was treated were not independently associated with the choice of DMARD.
CONCLUSIONS: When choosing DMARD monotherapy in early RA, rheumatologists in ERAN seem to preferentially prescribe MTX for patients with a poor prognosis and SSZ for patients with good prognosis. No DMARDs were used in older patients or in those with a low HAQ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20008093     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  7 in total

1.  The subjective components of the Disease Activity Score 28-joints (DAS28) in rheumatoid arthritis patients and coexisting fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Fausto Salaffi; Marco Di Carlo; Marina Carotti; Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Cost-minimisation analysis of subcutaneous methotrexate versus biologic therapy for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have had an insufficient response or intolerance to oral methotrexate.

Authors:  Ray Fitzpatrick; David Gi Scott; Ian Keary
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  [Combination therapy using methotrexate with DMARDs or biologics--current status].

Authors:  K Krüger
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  Combination of MTX and LEF attenuates inflammatory bone erosion by down-regulation of receptor activator of NF-kB ligand and interleukin-17 in type II collagen-induced arthritis rats.

Authors:  Yao Yao; Cong-zhu Ding; Yun Fang
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  Predictors of change in bodily pain in early rheumatoid arthritis: an inception cohort study.

Authors:  Daniel F McWilliams; Weiya Zhang; Josephine S Mansell; Patrick D W Kiely; Adam Young; David A Walsh
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.794

6.  Baseline factors predicting change from the initial DMARD treatment during the first 2 years of rheumatoid arthritis: experience in the ERAN inception cohort.

Authors:  Daniel F McWilliams; Patrick D W Kiely; Adam Young; David A Walsh
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Utilization patterns of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in elderly rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Authors:  Xue-Mei Jin; Joongyub Lee; Nam-Kyong Choi; Jong-Mi Seong; Ju-Young Shin; Ye-Jee Kim; Mi-Sook Kim; Bo Ram Yang; Byung-Joo Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.153

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.