Literature DB >> 20007844

Modeling complex workflow in molecular diagnostics: design specifications of laboratory software for support of personalized medicine.

Mohamed E Gomah1, James P Turley, Huimin Lu, Dan Jones.   

Abstract

One of the hurdles to achieving personalized medicine has been implementing the laboratory processes for performing and reporting complex molecular tests. The rapidly changing test rosters and complex analysis platforms in molecular diagnostics have meant that many clinical laboratories still use labor-intensive manual processing and testing without the level of automation seen in high-volume chemistry and hematology testing. We provide here a discussion of design requirements and the results of implementation of a suite of lab management tools that incorporate the many elements required for use of molecular diagnostics in personalized medicine, particularly in cancer. These applications provide the functionality required for sample accessioning and tracking, material generation, and testing that are particular to the evolving needs of individualized molecular diagnostics. On implementation, the applications described here resulted in improvements in the turn-around time for reporting of more complex molecular test sets, and significant changes in the workflow. Therefore, careful mapping of workflow can permit design of software applications that simplify even the complex demands of specialized molecular testing. By incorporating design features for order review, software tools can permit a more personalized approach to sample handling and test selection without compromising efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20007844      PMCID: PMC2797718          DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2010.090082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  14 in total

1.  Combining medical informatics and bioinformatics toward tools for personalized medicine.

Authors:  B D Sarachan; M K Simmons; P Subramanian; J M Temkin
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.176

2.  Using usability heuristics to evaluate patient safety of medical devices.

Authors:  Jiajie Zhang; Todd R Johnson; Vimla L Patel; Danielle L Paige; Tate Kubose
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2003 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  The significance of cognitive modeling in building healthcare interfaces.

Authors:  Constance M Johnson; James P Turley
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 4.  Preanalytical variability: the dark side of the moon in laboratory testing.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Gian Cesare Guidi; Camilla Mattiuzzi; Mario Plebani
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 5.  Recommendations for detection and management of unsuitable samples in clinical laboratories.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Giuseppe Banfi; Mauro Buttarello; Ferruccio Ceriotti; Massimo Daves; Alberto Dolci; Marco Caputo; Davide Giavarina; Martina Montagnana; Valentino Miconi; Bruno Milanesi; Andrea Mosca; Margherita Morandini; Gian Luca Salvagno
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Laboratory medicine: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Xavier Bossuyt; Kurt Verweire; Norbert Blanckaert
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Future developments of medical informatics from the viewpoint of networked clinical research. Interoperability and integration.

Authors:  C Ohmann; W Kuchinke
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.176

8.  Development of an integrated genome informatics, data management and workflow infrastructure: a toolbox for the study of complex disease genetics.

Authors:  Oliver S Burren; Barry C Healy; Alex C Lam; Helen Schuilenburg; Geoffrey E Dolman; Vincent H Everett; Davide Laneri; Sarah Nutland; Helen E Rance; Felicity Payne; Deborah Smyth; Chris Lowe; Bryan J Barratt; Rebecca C J Twells; Daniel B Rainbow; Linda S Wicker; John A Todd; Neil M Walker; Luc J Smink
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.639

9.  Case study: improving efficiency in a large hospital laboratory.

Authors:  Marilynn Bartel
Journal:  Clin Leadersh Manag Rev       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

Review 10.  Commercial molecular diagnostics in the U.S.: The Human Genome Project to the clinical laboratory.

Authors:  Jean Amos; Meeta Patnaik
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.878

View more
  4 in total

1.  A core curriculum for clinical fellowship training in pathology informatics.

Authors:  David S McClintock; Bruce P Levy; William J Lane; Roy E Lee; Jason M Baron; Veronica E Klepeis; Maristela L Onozato; Jiyeon Kim; Anand S Dighe; Bruce A Beckwith; Frank Kuo; Stephen Black-Schaffer; John R Gilbertson
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2012-08-30

2.  Targeted Therapy Database (TTD): a model to match patient's molecular profile with current knowledge on cancer biology.

Authors:  Simone Mocellin; Jeff Shrager; Richard Scolyer; Sandro Pasquali; Daunia Verdi; Francesco M Marincola; Marta Briarava; Randy Gobbel; Carlo Rossi; Donato Nitti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  How to make Mathematics Biology's next and better microscope.

Authors:  Jim Huggett; Justin O'Grady; Stephen Bustin
Journal:  Biomol Detect Quantif       Date:  2014-09-10

Review 4.  Clinical Utility of Advanced Microbiology Testing Tools.

Authors:  Melissa B Miller; Faranak Atrzadeh; C A Burnham; Stephen Cavalieri; James Dunn; Stephen Jones; Charles Mathews; Peggy McNult; John Meduri; Chris Newhouse; Duane Newton; Michael Oberholzer; John Osiecki; David Pedersen; Nicole Sweeney; Natalie Whitfield; Joe Campos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 5.948

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.