Literature DB >> 20007832

Post-illumination pupil response in subjects without ocular disease.

Laxmikanth Kankipati1, Christopher A Girkin, Paul D Gamlin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A sustained pupilloconstriction is often observed after the cessation of a bright visual stimulus. This post-illumination pupil response (PIPR) is produced by the intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs). The present study was designed to examine the characteristics of the PIPR in a normal population without ocular disease.
METHODS: Thirty-seven subjects (mean age, 48.6 years) were tested by presenting a 60 degrees, 10-second light stimulus (13 log quanta/cm(2)/s retinal irradiance) and recording pupillary responses for 50 seconds after light cessation. The light stimuli (470 [blue] and 623 [red] nm) were presented by an optical system to one eye after dilation, while the consensual pupil response of the fellow, undilated eye was recorded by infrared pupillometry.
RESULTS: A positive PIPR was seen in all subjects tested. The population average of the PIPR for 470-nm light was 1.5 mm (SEM 0.10, P < 0.05) and the net PIPR (blue PIPR minus red PIPR) was 1.4 mm (SEM 0.09, P < 0.0001). The net PIPR correlated positively with baseline pupil diameter (P < 0.05), but not significantly with age, race, or sex (P > 0.05) in the test population.
CONCLUSIONS: All normal subjects displayed a significant PIPR for a 10-second, 470-nm light stimulus, but not a 623-nm stimulus, which is consistent with the proposed melanopsin-mediated response. In most normal individuals, the amplitude of the PIPR was substantial. This test has the potential to be used as a tool in evaluating subjects with inner retinal dysfunction or melanopsin-related disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20007832      PMCID: PMC2868495          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  23 in total

1.  The spectral sensitivity of the consensual light reflex.

Authors:  M ALPERN; F W CAMPBELL
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1962-12       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Aging of the human lens.

Authors:  J Pokorny; V C Smith; M Lutze
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1987-04-15       Impact factor: 1.980

3.  A novel human opsin in the inner retina.

Authors:  I Provencio; I R Rodriguez; G Jiang; W P Hayes; E F Moreira; M D Rollag
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Influence of eye colors of Caucasians and Asians on suppression of melatonin secretion by light.

Authors:  Shigekazu Higuchi; Yutaka Motohashi; Keita Ishibashi; Takafumi Maeda
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Effect of age on pupillary light reflex: evaluation of pupil mobility for clinical practice and research.

Authors:  D F Fotiou; C G Brozou; D J Tsiptsios; A Fotiou; A Kabitsi; M Nakou; C Giantselidis; A Goula
Journal:  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb

6.  Melanopsin-expressing ganglion cells in primate retina signal colour and irradiance and project to the LGN.

Authors:  Dennis M Dacey; Hsi-Wen Liao; Beth B Peterson; Farrel R Robinson; Vivianne C Smith; Joel Pokorny; King-Wai Yau; Paul D Gamlin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Light-induced melatonin suppression: age-related reduction in response to short wavelength light.

Authors:  Mirela Herljevic; Benita Middleton; Kavita Thapan; Debra J Skene
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 4.032

8.  Melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells: architecture, projections, and intrinsic photosensitivity.

Authors:  S Hattar; H W Liao; M Takao; D M Berson; K W Yau
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The influence of intrinsically-photosensitive retinal ganglion cells on the spectral sensitivity and response dynamics of the human pupillary light reflex.

Authors:  David H McDougal; Paul D Gamlin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Short-wavelength light sensitivity of circadian, pupillary, and visual awareness in humans lacking an outer retina.

Authors:  Farhan H Zaidi; Joseph T Hull; Stuart N Peirson; Katharina Wulff; Daniel Aeschbach; Joshua J Gooley; George C Brainard; Kevin Gregory-Evans; Joseph F Rizzo; Charles A Czeisler; Russell G Foster; Merrick J Moseley; Steven W Lockley
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  59 in total

1.  Assessing rod, cone, and melanopsin contributions to human pupil flicker responses.

Authors:  Pablo A Barrionuevo; Nathaniel Nicandro; J Jason McAnany; Andrew J Zele; Paul Gamlin; Dingcai Cao
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  The aging clock: circadian rhythms and later life.

Authors:  Suzanne Hood; Shimon Amir
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Sustained effects of prior red light on pupil diameter and vigilance during subsequent darkness.

Authors:  Wisse P van der Meijden; Bart H W Te Lindert; Jennifer R Ramautar; Yishul Wei; Joris E Coppens; Maarten Kamermans; Christian Cajochen; Patrice Bourgin; Eus J W Van Someren
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The post illumination pupil response is reduced in seasonal affective disorder.

Authors:  Kathryn Roecklein; Patricia Wong; Natalie Ernecoff; Megan Miller; Shannon Donofry; Marissa Kamarck; W Michael Wood-Vasey; Peter Franzen
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.222

5.  Melanopsin and rod-cone photoreceptors play different roles in mediating pupillary light responses during exposure to continuous light in humans.

Authors:  Joshua J Gooley; Ivan Ho Mien; Melissa A St Hilaire; Sing-Chen Yeo; Eric Chern-Pin Chua; Eliza van Reen; Catherine J Hanley; Joseph T Hull; Charles A Czeisler; Steven W Lockley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Autonomic control of the eye.

Authors:  David H McDougal; Paul D Gamlin
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 9.090

7.  Profound defects in pupillary responses to light in TRPM-channel null mice: a role for TRPM channels in non-image-forming photoreception.

Authors:  Steven Hughes; Carina A Pothecary; Aarti Jagannath; Russell G Foster; Mark W Hankins; Stuart N Peirson
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Factors influencing the pupillary light reflex in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Sourabh Sharma; Mani Baskaran; Annadata V Rukmini; Monisha E Nongpiur; HlaMyint Htoon; Ching-Yu Cheng; Shamira A Perera; Joshua J Gooley; Tin Aung; Dan Milea
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Effect of stimulus size and luminance on the rod-, cone-, and melanopsin-mediated pupillary light reflex.

Authors:  Jason C Park; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Temporal characteristics of melanopsin inputs to the human pupil light reflex.

Authors:  Daniel S Joyce; Beatrix Feigl; Dingcai Cao; Andrew J Zele
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.