Literature DB >> 20006920

Unexpected major role for venous stenting in deep reflux disease.

Seshadri Raju1, Rikki Darcey, Peter Neglén.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) has largely focused on reflux. Minimally-invasive techniques to address superficial and perforator reflux have evolved, but correction of deep reflux continues to be challenging. The advent of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) scan and minimally invasive venous stent technology have renewed interest in the obstructive component in CVI pathophysiology. The aim of this study is to assess stent-related and clinical outcomes following treatment by iliac venous stenting alone in limbs with a combination of iliac vein obstruction and deep venous reflux.
METHODS: A total of 528 limbs in 504 patients, ranging in age from 15 to 87, underwent IVUS-guided iliac vein stent placement to correct obstruction over an 11-year period. The etiology of obstruction was nonthrombotic in 196 (37%), post-thrombotic in 285 (54%) limbs, and combined in 47 (9%). Clinical severity class of CEAP was C3 in 44%, C(4,5) in 27%, and C6 in 25% of stented limbs. Deep venous reflux was present in all limbs, associated with superficial and/or perforator reflux in 69%. Reflux was severe in 309/528 (59%) limbs (reflux multisegment score > or = 3) and 224/528 (42%) limbs had axial reflux. Venography and other functional tests had poor diagnostic sensitivity to detect obstruction, which was ultimately diagnosed by IVUS. The IVUS-guided iliac vein stenting was the only procedure performed and the associated reflux was left uncorrected.
RESULTS: There was no mortality; morbidity was minor. Cumulative secondary stent patency was 88% at 5 years; no stent occlusions occurred in nonthrombotic limbs. Cumulative rates of limbs with healed active ulcers, freedom of ulcer recurrence in legs with healed ulcers (C5), and freedom from leg dermatitis at 5 years were 54%, 88%, and 81%, respectively. Cumulative rate of substantial improvement of pain and swelling at 5 years was 78% and 55%, respectively. Quality of life improved significantly. Reflux parameters did not deteriorate after stenting.
CONCLUSION: Iliac venous stenting alone is sufficient to control symptoms in the majority of patients with combined outflow obstruction and deep reflux. Partial correction of the pathophysiology in limbs with multisystem or multilevel disease can provide substantial symptom relief. Percutaneous stent technology in concert with other minimally-invasive techniques to address superficial and/or perforator reflux offers such partial correction in limbs with advanced CVI and complex venous pathology. Open correction of obstruction or reflux is now required only infrequently as a "last resort". Copyright 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20006920     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  13 in total

Review 1.  Role of venous stenting for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Karen Breen
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2020-12-04

2.  Endovascular stent placement for chronic post-thrombotic symptomatic ilio-femoral venous obstructive lesions: a single-center study of safety, efficacy and quality-of-life improvement.

Authors:  Marie-Tiphaine Falcoz; Nicolas Falvo; Serge Aho-Glélé; Emmanuel Demaistre; Christophe Galland; Sylvain Favelier; Pierre Pottecher; Olivier Chevallier; Bernard Bonnotte; Sylvain Audia; Maxime Samson; Béatrice Terriat; Marco Midulla; Romaric Loffroy
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-08

Review 3.  The Treatment of Post-Thrombotic Syndrome.

Authors:  Karina Schleimer; Mohammad Esmaeil Barbati; Alexander Gombert; Volker Wienert; Jochen Grommes; Houman Jalaie
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 4.  Endovascular Interventions for Acute and Chronic Lower Extremity Deep Venous Disease: State of the Art.

Authors:  Akhilesh K Sista; Suresh Vedantham; John A Kaufman; David C Madoff
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  The role of intravascular ultrasound in venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Robert B McLafferty
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  Recanalization and flow regulate venous thrombus resolution and matrix metalloproteinase expression in vivo.

Authors:  Christine Chabasse; Suzanne A Siefert; Mohammed Chaudry; Mark H Hoofnagle; Brajesh K Lal; Rajabrata Sarkar
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord       Date:  2014-05-10

Review 7.  Treatment of Nonthrombotic Iliac Vein Lesions.

Authors:  Maria Joh; Kush R Desai
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 1.780

8.  Diagnosis of stenosis within the popliteal-femoral venous segment upon clinical presentation with a venous ulcer and subsequent successful treatment with venoplasty.

Authors:  Emma Dabbs; Alina Sheikh; David Beckett; Mark S Whiteley
Journal:  SAGE Open Med Case Rep       Date:  2017-11-03

9.  Venoplasty and Venous Stenting in Patients with Chronic Venous Insufficiency in the Lower Extremities.

Authors:  Majid Moeini; Mohammad Reza Zafarghandi; Morteza Shahbandari; Azadeh Sayarifard; Morteza Taghavi; Javad Salimi; Pezhman Farshidmehr; Mohammad Hasani; Mohammad Reza Tobaei
Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent       Date:  2016-10-03

10.  Gadobutrol versus gadofosveset-trisodium in MR venography of the lower extremities.

Authors:  Carsten W K P Arnoldussen; Yeelai Lam; Nobutake Ito; Bjorn Winkens; M Eline Kooi; Cees H A Wittens; Joachim E Wildberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.