Literature DB >> 20006680

Functional recovery of stepping in rats after a complete neonatal spinal cord transection is not due to regrowth across the lesion site.

N J K Tillakaratne1, J J Guu, R D de Leon, A J Bigbee, N J London, H Zhong, M D Ziegler, R L Joynes, R R Roy, V R Edgerton.   

Abstract

Rats receiving a complete spinal cord transection (ST) at a neonatal stage spontaneously can recover significant stepping ability, whereas minimal recovery is attained in rats transected as adults. In addition, neonatally spinal cord transected rats trained to step more readily improve their locomotor ability. We hypothesized that recovery of stepping in rats receiving a complete spinal cord transection at postnatal day 5 (P5) is attributable to changes in the lumbosacral neural circuitry and not to regeneration of axons across the lesion. As expected, stepping performance measured by several kinematics parameters was significantly better in ST (at P5) trained (treadmill stepping for 8 weeks) than age-matched non-trained spinal rats. Anterograde tracing with biotinylated dextran amine showed an absence of labeling of corticospinal or rubrospinal tract axons below the transection. Retrograde tracing with Fast Blue from the spinal cord below the transection showed no labeled neurons in the somatosensory motor cortex of the hindlimb area, red nucleus, spinal vestibular nucleus, and medullary reticular nucleus. Retrograde labeling transsynaptically via injection of pseudorabies virus (Bartha) into the soleus and tibialis anterior muscles showed no labeling in the same brain nuclei. Furthermore, re-transection of the spinal cord at or rostral to the original transection did not affect stepping ability. Combined, these results clearly indicate that there was no regeneration across the lesion after a complete spinal cord transection in neonatal rats and suggest that this is an important model to understand the higher level of locomotor recovery in rats attributable to lumbosacral mechanisms after receiving a complete ST at a neonatal compared to an adult stage. Copyright 2010 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20006680      PMCID: PMC2820384          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  43 in total

1.  Intercostal nerve implants transduced with an adenoviral vector encoding neurotrophin-3 promote regrowth of injured rat corticospinal tract fibers and improve hindlimb function.

Authors:  B Blits; P A Dijkhuizen; G J Boer; J Verhaagen
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Chronically injured supraspinal neurons exhibit only modest axonal dieback in response to a cervical hemisection lesion.

Authors:  J D Houle; Y Jin
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.330

3.  Implications of assist-as-needed robotic step training after a complete spinal cord injury on intrinsic strategies of motor learning.

Authors:  Lance L Cai; Andy J Fong; Chad K Otoshi; Yongqiang Liang; Joel W Burdick; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Two chronic motor training paradigms differentially influence acute instrumental learning in spinally transected rats.

Authors:  Allison J Bigbee; Eric D Crown; Adam R Ferguson; Roland R Roy; Niranjala J K Tillakaratne; James W Grau; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-25       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Motor strategies used by rats spinalized at birth to maintain stance in response to imposed perturbations.

Authors:  Simon F Giszter; Michelle R Davies; Virginia Graziani
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Inosine stimulates extensive axon collateral growth in the rat corticospinal tract after injury.

Authors:  L I Benowitz; D E Goldberg; J R Madsen; D Soni; N Irwin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Exercise induces cortical plasticity after neonatal spinal cord injury in the rat.

Authors:  Tina Kao; Jed S Shumsky; Marion Murray; Karen A Moxon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Changes in GABA(A) receptor subunit gamma 2 in extensor and flexor motoneurons and astrocytes after spinal cord transection and motor training.

Authors:  Windyanne Khristy; Noore J Ali; Arlene B Bravo; Ray de Leon; Roland R Roy; Hui Zhong; Nik J L London; V Reggie Edgerton; Niranjala J K Tillakaratne
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Step training reinforces specific spinal locomotor circuitry in adult spinal rats.

Authors:  Ronaldo M Ichiyama; Grégoire Courtine; Yury P Gerasimenko; Grace J Yang; Rubia van den Brand; Igor A Lavrov; Hui Zhong; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Locomotor ability in spinal rats is dependent on the amount of activity imposed on the hindlimbs during treadmill training.

Authors:  John Cha; Chad Heng; David J Reinkensmeyer; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton; Ray D De Leon
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.269

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of exercise training to promote locomotor recovery in animal models of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Camila R Battistuzzo; Robert J Callister; Robin Callister; Mary P Galea
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  A leech model for homeostatic plasticity and motor network recovery after loss of descending inputs.

Authors:  Brian J Lane
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Contrasting neuropathology and functional recovery after spinal cord injury in developing and adult rats.

Authors:  Qiuju Yuan; Huanxing Su; Kin Chiu; Wutian Wu; Zhi-Xiu Lin
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 5.203

4.  DNA methylation and behavioral changes induced by neonatal spinal transection.

Authors:  Tiffany S Doherty; Aimee L Bozeman; Tania L Roth; Michele R Brumley
Journal:  Infant Behav Dev       Date:  2019-09-23

5.  The beneficial effects of treadmill step training on activity-dependent synaptic and cellular plasticity markers after complete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jocemar Ilha; Lígia A Centenaro; Núbia Broetto Cunha; Daniela F de Souza; Mariane Jaeger; Patrícia S do Nascimento; Janaína Kolling; Juliana Ben; Simone Marcuzzo; Angela T S Wyse; Carmem Gottfried; Matilde Achaval
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.996

6.  Descending Systems Direct Development of Key Spinal Motor Circuits.

Authors:  Calvin C Smith; Julian F R Paton; Samit Chakrabarty; Ronaldo M Ichiyama
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Alternatively activated macrophages in spinal cord injury and remission: another mechanism for repair?

Authors:  Taekyun Shin; Meejung Ahn; Changjong Moon; Seungjoon Kim; Ki-Bum Sim
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 5.590

8.  Rapid recovery and altered neurochemical dependence of locomotor central pattern generation following lumbar neonatal spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Mark Züchner; Elena Kondratskaya; Camilla B Sylte; Joel C Glover; Jean-Luc Boulland
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-12-03       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Schwann cell transplantation exerts neuroprotective roles in rat model of spinal cord injury by combating inflammasome activation and improving motor recovery and remyelination.

Authors:  Mahboubeh Mousavi; Azim Hedayatpour; Keywan Mortezaee; Yousef Mohamadi; Farid Abolhassani; Gholamreza Hassanzadeh
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 3.584

Review 10.  Developmental plasticity of coordinated action patterns in the perinatal rat.

Authors:  Michele R Brumley; Sierra D Kauer; Hillary E Swann
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.