Literature DB >> 20006634

Human health safety evaluation of cosmetics in the EU: a legally imposed challenge to science.

M Pauwels1, V Rogiers.   

Abstract

As stated in the European legislation, cosmetic products present on the European market must be safe for the consumer. Safety evaluation of the products is carried out by a qualified safety assessor who needs to consider potential exposure scenarios next to the physicochemical and toxicological profiles of all composing ingredients. Whereas, until recently, the tools to determine the toxicological profile of cosmetic ingredients mainly consisted of animal experiments, they have now been narrowed down substantially by the legally imposed animal testing ban on cosmetic ingredients, taken up in the Cosmetic Products Directive (76/768/EEC). This Directive, however, is not a stand-alone piece of European legislation, since as well directly as indirectly it is influenced by a complex web of related legislations. Vertical legislations deal with different categories of chemicals, including dangerous substances, biocides, plant protection products, food additives, medicinal products, and of course also cosmetics. Horizontal legislative texts, on the contrary, cover more general fields such as protection of experimental animals, consumer product safety, misleading of consumers, specific provisions for aerosols, and others. Experience has learnt that having a general overview of these related legislations is necessary to understand their impact on the cosmetic world in general terms and on cosmetic safety evaluation in particular. This goes for a variety of concerned parties, including national and European regulators/agencies, contract laboratories, raw material suppliers, cosmetic companies, research and educational centers. They all deal with a number of aspects important for the quality and toxicity of cosmetics and their ingredients. This review summarises the most relevant points of the legislative texts of different types of product categories and emphasises their impact on the safety evaluation of cosmetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20006634     DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  11 in total

1.  Chemical Characterization and Bioactivity of Commercial Essential Oils and Hydrolates Obtained from Portuguese Forest Logging and Thinning.

Authors:  Ana Ruas; Angelica Graça; Joana Marto; Lídia Gonçalves; Ana Oliveira; Alexandra Nogueira da Silva; Madalena Pimentel; Artur Mendes Moura; Ana Teresa Serra; Ana Cristina Figueiredo; Helena M Ribeiro
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.927

2.  Use of in vitro HTS-derived concentration-response data as biological descriptors improves the accuracy of QSAR models of in vivo toxicity.

Authors:  Alexander Sedykh; Hao Zhu; Hao Tang; Liying Zhang; Ann Richard; Ivan Rusyn; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  CORAL: model for no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL).

Authors:  Andrey A Toropov; Alla P Toropova; Fabiola Pizzo; Anna Lombardo; Domenico Gadaleta; Emilio Benfenati
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.943

4.  High-definition optical coherence tomography intrinsic skin ageing assessment in women: a pilot study.

Authors:  M A L M Boone; M Suppa; A Marneffe; M Miyamoto; G B E Jemec; V Del Marmol
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.017

5.  The enlightenment from Malaysian consumers' perspective toward cosmetic products.

Authors:  Ain Ayob; Ammar Ihsan Awadh; Juliana Jafri; Shazia Jamshed; Hawa Mas Azmar Ahmad; Hazrina Hadi
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

6.  Development and validation of a high-throughput transcriptomic biomarker to address 21st century genetic toxicology needs.

Authors:  Heng-Hong Li; Renxiang Chen; Daniel R Hyduke; Andrew Williams; Roland Frötschl; Heidrun Ellinger-Ziegelbauer; Raegan O'Lone; Carole L Yauk; Jiri Aubrecht; Albert J Fornace
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Improving the prediction of organism-level toxicity through integration of chemical, protein target and cytotoxicity qHTS data.

Authors:  Chad H G Allen; Alexios Koutsoukas; Isidro Cortés-Ciriano; Daniel S Murrell; Thérèse E Malliavin; Robert C Glen; Andreas Bender
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.524

8.  Safety assessment and biological effects of a new cold processed SilEmulsion for dermatological purpose.

Authors:  Sara Raposo; Ana Salgado; Lídia Gonçalves; Pedro C Pinto; Manuela Urbano; Helena M Ribeiro
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Interested consumers' awareness of harmful chemicals in everyday products.

Authors:  Sabrina Hartmann; Ursula Klaschka
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 5.893

Review 10.  Bridging the Data Gap From in vitro Toxicity Testing to Chemical Safety Assessment Through Computational Modeling.

Authors:  Qiang Zhang; Jin Li; Alistair Middleton; Sudin Bhattacharya; Rory B Conolly
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-09-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.