Literature DB >> 20006389

Bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implantation in young children.

M Tait1, T P Nikolopoulos, L De Raeve, S Johnson, G Datta, E Karltorp, E Ostlund, U Johansson, E van Knegsel, E A M Mylanus, P M H Gulpen, M Beers, J H M Frijns.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the preverbal communication skills of two groups of young implanted children: those with unilateral implantation and those with bilateral implantation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study assessed 69 children: 42 unilaterally and 27 bilaterally implanted with age at implantation less than 3 years. The preverbal skills of these children were measured before and 1 year after implantation, using Tait Video Analysis that has been found able to predict later speech outcomes in young implanted children.
RESULTS: Before implantation there was no significant difference between the unilateral group and the bilateral group. There was still no difference at 12 months following implantation where vocal autonomy is concerned, but a strongly significant difference between the groups for vocal turn-taking and non-looking vocal turns, the bilateral group outperforming the unilateral group. Regarding gestural turn-taking and gestural autonomy, there was a strongly significant difference between the two groups at the 12 month interval, and also a difference before implantation for gestural autonomy, the unilateral group having the higher scores. Multiple regression of non-looking vocal turns revealed that 1 year following implantation, bilateral implantation contributed to 51% of the variance (p<0.0001), after controlling for the influence of age at implantation and length of deafness which did not reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS: Profoundly deaf bilaterally implanted children are significantly more likely to use vocalisation to communicate, and to use audition when interacting vocally with an adult, compared with unilaterally implanted children. These results are independent of age at implantation and length of deafness. Copyright (c) 2009. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20006389     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  4 in total

1.  Influence of cochlear implantation on the vestibular function.

Authors:  Eirini Katsiari; Dimitrios G Balatsouras; John Sengas; Maria Riga; George S Korres; John Xenelis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The effect of differential listening experience on the development of expressive and receptive language in children with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Christi Hess; Cynthia Zettler-Greeley; Shelly P Godar; Susan Ellis-Weismer; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 3.  Bilateral Cochlear Implantation: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2018-10-24

4.  Accessibility to cochlear implants in Belgium: state of the art on selection, reimbursement, habilitation, and outcomes in children and adults.

Authors:  Leo De Raeve; Annelies Wouters
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2013-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.