Literature DB >> 20006355

Predictors of survival in patients with persistent nodal metastases after preoperative chemotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Brendon M Stiles1, Paul Christos, Jeffrey L Port, Paul C Lee, Subroto Paul, James Saunders, Nasser K Altorki.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In patients with esophageal cancer, a complete pathologic response after preoperative therapy is universally regarded as a favorable prognostic factor. However, less is known about factors predictive of outcome in patients with persistent nodal disease. The purpose of this study is to determine which variables affect survival in this patient population.
METHODS: We reviewed a prospectively maintained esophageal cancer database. Patients with positive lymph nodes after preoperative therapy and surgery were selected. Predictors of survival were examined univariately using the log-rank test. Factors identified at P < .20 by univariate analysis were selected for inclusion in a multivariate model.
RESULTS: Ninety-six patients with 1 or more positive nodes received preoperative therapy. Pathologic T classification was 0 to 2 in 25 (26%) patients and 3 to 4 in 71 (74%) patients. In 29 (30%) patients, nonregional nodal disease was present (M1). Final pathologic stages were IIB in 18 (19%), III in 49 (51%), and IV in 29 (30%). Postoperatively, 44 (46%) patients received additional chemotherapy. On univariate analysis, pathologic stage, pathologic T classification, and number of positive nodes significantly affected overall survival. On multivariate analysis, clinical stage (hazard ratio [HR], 2.25; P = .05), pathologic T classification (HR, 3.06; P = .006), and number of positive nodes (HR 1.03 per node, P = .09) were significant predictors of overall survival.
CONCLUSION: Long-term survival can be achieved in patients with esophageal cancer who have persistent nodal disease after neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection. Clinical stage, pathologic T classification, and number of positive nodes best predict survival. Nonregional nodal disease does not adversely affect outcome. Postoperative chemotherapy conferred no additional survival benefit in this patient population. 2010. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20006355     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  10 in total

1.  Adjuvant Therapy for Node-Positive Esophageal Cancer After Induction and Surgery: A Multisite Study.

Authors:  Tara R Semenkovich; Melanie Subramanian; Yan Yan; Wayne L Hofstetter; Arlene M Correa; Stephen D Cassivi; Matthew L Inra; Brendon M Stiles; Nasser K Altorki; Andrew C Chang; Alexander A Brescia; Gail E Darling; Frances Allison; Stephen R Broderick; Eric W Etchill; Felix G Fernandez; Ray K Chihara; Virginia R Litle; Juan A Muñoz-Largacha; Benjamin D Kozower; Varun Puri; Bryan F Meyers
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  The significance of lymph node status as a prognostic factor for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yasunori Akutsu; Hisahiro Matsubara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  A propensity-matched analysis comparing survival after primary minimally invasive esophagectomy followed by adjuvant therapy to neoadjuvant therapy for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Haris Zahoor; James D Luketich; Ryan M Levy; Omar Awais; Daniel G Winger; Michael K Gibson; Katie S Nason
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  What is the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation, and adjuvant treatment in resectable esophageal cancer?

Authors:  Nasser Altorki; Sebron Harrison
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-03

5.  Genome-wide association study identifies common variants in SLC39A6 associated with length of survival in esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Chen Wu; Dong Li; Weihua Jia; Zhibin Hu; Yifeng Zhou; Dianke Yu; Tong Tong; Mingrong Wang; Dongmei Lin; Yan Qiao; Yuling Zhou; Jiang Chang; Kan Zhai; Menghan Wang; Lixuan Wei; Wen Tan; Hongbing Shen; Yixin Zeng; Dongxin Lin
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Lymph Node Harvest During Esophagectomy Is Not Influenced by Use of Neoadjuvant Therapy or Clinical Disease Stage.

Authors:  Renato A Luna; James P Dolan; Brian S Diggs; Nathan W Bronson; Brett C Sheppard; Paul H Schipper; Brandon H Tieu; Benjamin T Feeney; Ken M Gatter; Gina M Vaccaro; Charles R Thomas; John G Hunter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Adjuvant Therapy for Positive Nodes After Induction Therapy and Resection of Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander A Brescia; Stephen R Broderick; Traves D Crabtree; Varun Puri; Joanne F Musick; Jennifer M Bell; Daniel Kreisel; A Sasha Krupnick; G Alexander Patterson; Bryan F Meyers
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Prognostic histological factors in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery.

Authors:  Cheng-Che Tu; Po-Kuei Hsu; Ling-I Chien; Wan-Chen Liu; Chien-Sheng Huang; Chih-Cheng Hsieh; Han-Shui Hsu; Yu-Chung Wu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Survival risk prediction model for patients with pT1-3 N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after R0 esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy for therapeutic purposes.

Authors:  Zhan Qi; Yuanping Hu; Rong Qiu; Juan Li; Yuekao Li; Ming He; Yuxiang Wang
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 1.522

10.  Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in patients with nodal metastases after neoadjuvant therapy and esophagectomy.

Authors:  Justin Drake; Kurt Tauer; David Portnoy; Benny Weksler
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.895

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.