Literature DB >> 20005993

Two automatic QT algorithms compared with manual measurement in identification of long QT syndrome.

Ulla-Britt Diamant1, Annika Winbo, Eva-Lena Stattin, Annika Rydberg, Milos Kesek, Steen M Jensen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is an inherited disorder that increases the risk of syncope and malignant ventricular arrhythmias, which may result in sudden death.
METHODS: We compared manual measurement by 4 observers (QT(manual)) and 3 computerized measurements for QT interval accuracy in the diagnosis of LQTS: 1. QT measured from the vector magnitude calculated from the 3 averaged orthogonal leads X, Y, and Z (QTVCG) and classified using the same predefined QTc cut-points for classification of QT prolongation as in manual measurements; 2. QT measured by a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) program (QTECG) and subsequently classified using the same cut-points as in (1) above; 3. The same QT value as in (2) above, automatically classified by a 12-lead ECG program with thresholds for QT prolongation adjusted for age and sex (QTinterpret). The population consisted of 94 genetically confirmed carriers of KCNQ1 (LQT1) and KCNH2 (LQT2) mutations and a combined control group of 28 genetically confirmed noncarriers and 66 unrelated healthy volunteers.
RESULTS: QT(VCG) provided the best combination of sensitivity (89%) and specificity (90%) in diagnosing LQTS, with 0.948 as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The evaluation of QT measurement by the 4 observers revealed a high interreader variability, and only 1 of 4 observers showed acceptable level of agreement in LQTS mutation carrier identification (kappa coefficient >0.75).
CONCLUSION: Automatic QT measurement by the Mida1000/CoroNet system (Ortivus AB, Danderyd, Sweden) is an accurate, efficient, and easily applied method for initial screening for LQTS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20005993     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2009.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electrocardiol        ISSN: 0022-0736            Impact factor:   1.438


  8 in total

1.  Automated versus manual measurement of the QT interval and corrected QT interval.

Authors:  Yuji Kasamaki; Yukio Ozawa; Masakatsu Ohta; Akira Sezai; Takashi Yamaki; Mutsuo Kaneko; Ichiro Watanabe; Atsushi Hirayama; Tomohiro Nakayama
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Vectorcardiographic recordings of the Q-T interval in a pediatric long Q-T syndrome population.

Authors:  Ulla-Britt Diamant; Steen M Jensen; Annika Winbo; Eva-Lena Stattin; Annika Rydberg
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  f-Wave suppression method for improvement of locating T-Wave ends in electrocardiograms during atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Xiaochuan Du; Nini Rao; Feng Ou; Guogong Xu; Lixue Yin; Gang Wang
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Automatic identification of a stable QRST complex for non-invasive evaluation of human cardiac electrophysiology.

Authors:  Gunilla Lundahl; Lennart Gransberg; Gabriel Bergqvist; Göran Bergström; Lennart Bergfeldt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  QT correction using Bazett's formula remains preferable in long QT syndrome type 1 and 2.

Authors:  Pia Dahlberg; Ulla-Britt Diamant; Thomas Gilljam; Annika Rydberg; Lennart Bergfeldt
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 1.468

6.  Smartwatch Electrocardiogram and Artificial Intelligence for Assessing Cardiac-Rhythm Safety of Drug Therapy in the COVID-19 Pandemic. The QT-logs study.

Authors:  Baptiste Maille; Marie Wilkin; Matthieu Million; Noémie Rességuier; Frédéric Franceschi; Linda Koutbi-Franceschi; Jérôme Hourdain; Elisa Martinez; Maxime Zabern; Christophe Gardella; Hervé Tissot-Dupont; Jagmeet P Singh; Jean-Claude Deharo; Laurent Fiorina
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 7.  Review of Processing Pathological Vectorcardiographic Records for the Detection of Heart Disease.

Authors:  Jaroslav Vondrak; Marek Penhaker
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  A simplified 3D model of whole heart electrical activity and 12-lead ECG generation.

Authors:  Siniša Sovilj; Ratko Magjarević; Nigel H Lovell; Socrates Dokos
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 2.238

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.