OBJECTIVES: To examine whether disrupted regulation of REM sleep propensity is implicated in nightmare (NM) pathophysiology. BACKGROUND: Heightened REM propensity induced by REM sleep deprivation is belied by increases in REM %, REM density and the dream-like quality of dream mentation during post-deprivation recovery sleep. Compromised regulation of REM sleep propensity may be a contributing factor in the pathophysiology of frequent NMs. METHODS: A preliminary study of 14 subjects with frequent NMs (> or = 1 NM/week; 27.6+/-9.9 years) and 11 healthy control subjects (<1 NM/month; 24.3+/-5.3 years) was undertaken. Subjects completed home sleep/dream logs and underwent three nights of polysomnographic recording with REM sleep deprivation on night 2. Group differences were assessed for a battery of REM sleep and dream measures on nights 1 and 3. RESULTS: Several measures, including #skipped early-night REM periods, REM latency, REM/NREM cycle length, early/late REM density, REM rebound, late-night REM% and dream vividness, suggested that REM sleep propensity was abnormally low for the frequent NM group throughout the 3-day study. CONCLUSIONS: Findings raise the possibility that REM anomalies recorded from NM sufferers sleeping in the laboratory environment reflect a disruption of one or more endogenous regulators of REM sleep propensity. 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether disrupted regulation of REM sleep propensity is implicated in nightmare (NM) pathophysiology. BACKGROUND: Heightened REM propensity induced by REM sleep deprivation is belied by increases in REM %, REM density and the dream-like quality of dream mentation during post-deprivation recovery sleep. Compromised regulation of REM sleep propensity may be a contributing factor in the pathophysiology of frequent NMs. METHODS: A preliminary study of 14 subjects with frequent NMs (> or = 1 NM/week; 27.6+/-9.9 years) and 11 healthy control subjects (<1 NM/month; 24.3+/-5.3 years) was undertaken. Subjects completed home sleep/dream logs and underwent three nights of polysomnographic recording with REM sleep deprivation on night 2. Group differences were assessed for a battery of REM sleep and dream measures on nights 1 and 3. RESULTS: Several measures, including #skipped early-night REM periods, REM latency, REM/NREM cycle length, early/late REM density, REM rebound, late-night REM% and dream vividness, suggested that REM sleep propensity was abnormally low for the frequent NM group throughout the 3-day study. CONCLUSIONS: Findings raise the possibility that REM anomalies recorded from NM sufferers sleeping in the laboratory environment reflect a disruption of one or more endogenous regulators of REM sleep propensity. 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors: Jennifer L Creamer; Matthew S Brock; Panagiotis Matsangas; Vida Motamedi; Vincent Mysliwiec Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Robert W Glosemeyer; Susanne Diekelmann; Werner Cassel; Karl Kesper; Ulrich Koehler; Stefan Westermann; Armin Steffen; Stefan Borgwardt; Ines Wilhelm; Laura Müller-Pinzler; Frieder M Paulus; Sören Krach; David S Stolz Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-10-14 Impact factor: 4.379