Ramachandhiran Udayar Pandian1. 1. Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Seberang Jaya Hospital, Seberang Jaya, Penang, Malaysia. pandian rm@yahoo.com
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:Threatened miscarriage is a common problem during pregnancy. METHODS: The aim of this prospective, open, randomised study was to determine whether dydrogesterone was more effective than conservative management alone in preventing miscarriage in women with vaginal bleeding up to week 16 of pregnancy. Women were excluded if they had a history of recurrent miscarriage. A total of 191 women were randomised to dydrogesterone (40 mg stat followed by 10mg twice daily) or conservative management (control group). The treatment was considered successful if the pregnancy continued beyond 20 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: The success rate in the dydrogesterone group was statistically significantly higher than that in the control group (87.5% vs. 71.6%; p<0.05). Miscarriage occurred in 12.5% of women in the dydrogesterone group compared with 28.4% in the control group (p<0.05). There were no differences between the groups with regard to the incidence of Caesarean section, placenta praevia, antepartum haemorrhage, preterm labour (weeks 28-36), pregnancy-induced hypertension or low birth weight (<2500 g) babies. There were no intrauterine deaths or congenital abnormalities in either group. CONCLUSION: Compared with conservative management, dydrogesterone had beneficial effects on maintaining pregnancy in women with threatened miscarriage. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Threatened miscarriage is a common problem during pregnancy. METHODS: The aim of this prospective, open, randomised study was to determine whether dydrogesterone was more effective than conservative management alone in preventing miscarriage in women with vaginal bleeding up to week 16 of pregnancy. Women were excluded if they had a history of recurrent miscarriage. A total of 191 women were randomised to dydrogesterone (40 mg stat followed by 10mg twice daily) or conservative management (control group). The treatment was considered successful if the pregnancy continued beyond 20 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: The success rate in the dydrogesterone group was statistically significantly higher than that in the control group (87.5% vs. 71.6%; p<0.05). Miscarriage occurred in 12.5% of women in the dydrogesterone group compared with 28.4% in the control group (p<0.05). There were no differences between the groups with regard to the incidence of Caesarean section, placenta praevia, antepartum haemorrhage, preterm labour (weeks 28-36), pregnancy-induced hypertension or low birth weight (<2500 g) babies. There were no intrauterine deaths or congenital abnormalities in either group. CONCLUSION: Compared with conservative management, dydrogesterone had beneficial effects on maintaining pregnancy in women with threatened miscarriage. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Arri Coomarasamy; Hoda M Harb; Adam J Devall; Versha Cheed; Tracy E Roberts; Ilias Goranitis; Chidubem B Ogwulu; Helen M Williams; Ioannis D Gallos; Abey Eapen; Jane P Daniels; Amna Ahmed; Ruth Bender-Atik; Kalsang Bhatia; Cecilia Bottomley; Jane Brewin; Meenakshi Choudhary; Fiona Crosfill; Shilpa Deb; W Colin Duncan; Andrew Ewer; Kim Hinshaw; Thomas Holland; Feras Izzat; Jemma Johns; Mary-Ann Lumsden; Padma Manda; Jane E Norman; Natalie Nunes; Caroline E Overton; Kathiuska Kriedt; Siobhan Quenby; Sandhya Rao; Jackie Ross; Anupama Shahid; Martyn Underwood; Nirmala Vaithilingham; Linda Watkins; Catherine Wykes; Andrew W Horne; Davor Jurkovic; Lee J Middleton Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Hongying Kuang; Yan Li; Xiaoke Wu; Lihui Hou; Taixiang Wu; Jianping Liu; Ernest Hung Yu Ng; Elisabet Stener-Victorin; Richard S Legro; Heping Zhang Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2013-08-20 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: Diana Man Ka Chan; Ka Wang Cheung; Sofie Shuk Fei Yung; Vivian Chi Yan Lee; Raymond Hang Wun Li; Ernest Hung Yu Ng Journal: Trials Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Laura Jeschke; Clarisa Guillermina Santamaria; Nicole Meyer; Ana Claudia Zenclussen; Julia Bartley; Anne Schumacher Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-05-20 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Joanne E Given; Maria Loane; Johannes M Luteijn; Joan K Morris; Lolkje T W de Jong van den Berg; Ester Garne; Marie-Claude Addor; Ingeborg Barisic; Hermien de Walle; Miriam Gatt; Kari Klungsoyr; Babak Khoshnood; Anna Latos-Bielenska; Vera Nelen; Amanda J Neville; Mary O'Mahony; Anna Pierini; David Tucker; Awi Wiesel; Helen Dolk Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 4.335