BACKGROUND: Renal allograft vascular thrombosis is a complication that often results in graft loss. Since there are no guidelines on immediate postoperative thromboprophylaxis, we performed a telephone survey of clinical practice in all renal transplantation centers in France. METHODS: Each center considered 4 cases relating to renal transplant candidates on dialysis with an increasing risk of thrombosis: Case 1: patient with no identified risk factors; Case 2: patient with an earlier incidence of deep vein thrombosis; Case 3: patient with ischemic heart disease on antiplatelet therapy; Case 4: patient with atrial fibrillation taking a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) with lupus nephritis syndrome. RESULTS: The treatments proposed by the centers (%) were: Case 1: No anticoagulation therapy (57.1%), calcium heparin at prophylactic doses (P-dose) (40%), or unfractionated heparin (UFH); (P-dose; 2.9%). Case 2: No anticoagulation therapy (34.3%), calcium heparin (P-dose; 51.4%), or UFH (P-dose; 5.7%). Case 3: (A) Interruption of aspirin (65.7%), and either no anticoagulation therapy (21.7%) or substitution of aspirin by calcium heparin (P-dose; 56.6%) or by UFH (P-dose; 8.7%). (B) No interruption of aspirin (34.3%), and either no additional prophylaxis (58.3%) or calcium heparin (P-dose; 33.3%). Case 4: Interruption of VKA (100%), and UFH at a curative dose (68.6%), UFH (P-dose; 14.3%), or calcium heparin (P-dose; 11.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Practices varied widely in the absence of studies of sufficiently high power. There is a need for a preoperative classification of thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk among renal transplant candidates and for consensus guidelines.
BACKGROUND:Renal allograft vascular thrombosis is a complication that often results in graft loss. Since there are no guidelines on immediate postoperative thromboprophylaxis, we performed a telephone survey of clinical practice in all renal transplantation centers in France. METHODS: Each center considered 4 cases relating to renal transplant candidates on dialysis with an increasing risk of thrombosis: Case 1: patient with no identified risk factors; Case 2: patient with an earlier incidence of deep vein thrombosis; Case 3: patient with ischemic heart disease on antiplatelet therapy; Case 4: patient with atrial fibrillation taking a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) with lupus nephritis syndrome. RESULTS: The treatments proposed by the centers (%) were: Case 1: No anticoagulation therapy (57.1%), calcium heparin at prophylactic doses (P-dose) (40%), or unfractionated heparin (UFH); (P-dose; 2.9%). Case 2: No anticoagulation therapy (34.3%), calcium heparin (P-dose; 51.4%), or UFH (P-dose; 5.7%). Case 3: (A) Interruption of aspirin (65.7%), and either no anticoagulation therapy (21.7%) or substitution of aspirin by calcium heparin (P-dose; 56.6%) or by UFH (P-dose; 8.7%). (B) No interruption of aspirin (34.3%), and either no additional prophylaxis (58.3%) or calcium heparin (P-dose; 33.3%). Case 4: Interruption of VKA (100%), and UFH at a curative dose (68.6%), UFH (P-dose; 14.3%), or calcium heparin (P-dose; 11.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Practices varied widely in the absence of studies of sufficiently high power. There is a need for a preoperative classification of thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk among renal transplant candidates and for consensus guidelines.
Authors: Rodrigo Guerra; Paulo Roberto Kawano; Marcelo Petean Amaro; Hamilto Akihissa Yamamoto; Fernando Ferreira Gomes Filho; João Luiz Amaro; Regina Paolucci El Dib; Herney Andres Garcia-Perdomo; Leonardo Oliveira Reis Journal: Am J Clin Exp Urol Date: 2022-06-15
Authors: Jessica L Hogan; Stanton J Rosenthal; Sri G Yarlagadda; Jill A Jones; Timothy M Schmitt; Sean C Kumer; Bruce Kaplan; Shenequa L Deas; Atta M Nawabi Journal: Int J Surg Case Rep Date: 2014-11-21
Authors: Ruta Zulpaite; Povilas Miknevicius; Bettina Leber; Kestutis Strupas; Philipp Stiegler; Peter Schemmer Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2021-12-24