Literature DB >> 20004996

Stakeholder perceptions of aid coordination implementation in the Zambian health sector.

Jesper Sundewall1, Kristina Jönsson, Caesar Cheelo, Göran Tomson.   

Abstract

In this study, we analysed stakeholder perceptions of the process of implementing the coordination of health-sector aid in Zambia, Africa. The aim of coordination of health aid is to increase the effectiveness of health systems and to ensure that donors comply with national priorities. With increases in the number of donors involved and resources available for health aid globally, the attention devoted to coordination worldwide has risen. While the theoretical basis of coordination has been relatively well-explored, less research has been carried out on the practicalities of how such coordination is to be implemented. In our study, we focused on potential differences between the views of the stakeholders, both government and donors, on the systems by which health aid is coordinated. A qualitative case study was conducted comprising interviews with government and donor stakeholders in the health sector, as well as document review and observations of meetings. Results suggested that stakeholders are generally satisfied with the implementation of health-sector aid coordination in Zambia. However, there were differences in perceptions of the level of coordination of plans and agreements, which can be attributed to difficulties in harmonizing and aligning organizational requirements with the Zambian health-sector plans. In order to achieve the aims of the Paris Declaration; to increase harmonization, alignment and ownership--resources from donors must be better coordinated in the health sector planning process. This requires careful consideration of contextual constraints surrounding each donor. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20004996     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  7 in total

1.  Power and Agenda-Setting in Tanzanian Health Policy: An Analysis of Stakeholder Perspectives.

Authors:  Sara Elisa Fischer; Martin Strandberg-Larsen
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2016-02-09

2.  Harmonisation and standardisation of health sector and programme reviews and evaluations - how can they better inform health policy dialogue?

Authors:  Juliet Nabyonga-Orem; Prosper Tumusiime; Jennifer Nyoni; Aku Kwamie
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2016-12-16

3.  Integrated primary health care in low- and middle-income countries: a double challenge.

Authors:  Thomas Druetz
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 4.  Results-Based Financing for Health: A Case Study of Knowledge and Perceptions Among Stakeholders in a Donor-Funded Program in Zambia.

Authors:  Rachel Bergman; Birger C Forsberg; Jesper Sundewall
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2021-12-21

5.  Aid alignment: a longer term lens on trends in development assistance for health in Uganda.

Authors:  Elizabeth Stierman; Freddie Ssengooba; Sara Bennett
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.185

6.  Coordination of the health policy dialogue process in Guinea: pre- and post-Ebola.

Authors:  Nadege Ade; Adzodo Réne; Mara Khalifa; Kevin Ousman Babila; Martin Ekeke Monono; Elongo Tarcisse; Juliet Nabyonga-Orem
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Improved harmonisation from policy dialogue? Realist perspectives from Guinea and Chad.

Authors:  Aku Kwamie; Juliet Nabyonga-Orem
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.