Literature DB >> 20004882

Maternal and newborn morbidity by birth facility among selected United States 2006 low-risk births.

Joseph R Wax1, Michael G Pinette, Angelina Cartin, Jacquelyn Blackstone.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate perinatal morbidity by delivery location (hospital, freestanding birth center, and home). STUDY
DESIGN: Selected 2006 US birth certificate data were accessed online from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Low-risk maternal and newborn outcomes were tabulated and compared by birth facility.
RESULTS: A total of 745,690 deliveries were included, of which 733,143 (97.0%) occurred in hospital, 4661 (0.6%) at birth centers, and 7427 (0.9%) at home. Compared with hospital deliveries, home and birthing center deliveries were associated with more frequent prolonged and precipitous labors. Home births experienced more frequent 5-minute Apgar scores <7. In contrast, home and birthing center deliveries were associated with less frequent chorioamnionitis, fetal intolerance of labor, meconium staining, assisted ventilation, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and birthweight <2500 g.
CONCLUSION: Home births are associated with a number of less frequent adverse perinatal outcomes at the expense of more frequent abnormal labors and low 5-minute Apgar scores. Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20004882     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.09.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

1.  Planned Out-of-Hospital Birth and Birth Outcomes.

Authors:  Jonathan M Snowden; Ellen L Tilden; Janice Snyder; Brian Quigley; Aaron B Caughey; Yvonne W Cheng
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Infection control in delivery care units, Gujarat state, India: a needs assessment.

Authors:  Rajesh Mehta; Dileep V Mavalankar; K V Ramani; Sheetal Sharma; Julia Hussein
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 3.  Freestanding Midwife-Led Units: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Grażyna Bączek; Urszula Tataj-Puzyna; Dorota Sys; Barbara Baranowska
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2020-04-18

4.  The "Cocoon," first alongside midwifery-led unit within a Belgian hospital: Comparison of the maternal and neonatal outcomes with the standard obstetric unit over 2 years.

Authors:  Karine Welffens; Sara Derisbourg; Elena Costa; Yvon Englert; Axelle Pintiaux; Michèle Warnimont; Christine Kirkpatrick; Pierre Buekens; Caroline Daelemans
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 5.  Home Birth in the Era of COVID-19: Counseling and Preparation for Pregnant Persons Living with HIV.

Authors:  Ashish Premkumar; Irina Cassimatis; Saba H Berhie; Jennifer Jao; Susan E Cohn; Sarah H Sutton; Brianne Condron; Jordan Levesque; Patricia M Garcia; Emily S Miller; Lynn M Yee
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Neonatal Mortality of Planned Home Birth in the United States in Relation to Professional Certification of Birth Attendants.

Authors:  Amos Grünebaum; Laurence B McCullough; Birgit Arabin; Robert L Brent; Malcolm I Levene; Frank A Chervenak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Evaluating Maternity Units: a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwife-led primary maternity units in New Zealand-clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Celia P Grigg; Sally K Tracy; Mark Tracy; Rea Daellenbach; Mary Kensington; Amy Monk; Virginia Schmied
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.