Calman Prussin1, Joohee Lee, Barbara Foster. 1. Laboratory of Allergic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1881, USA. cprussin@niaid.nih.gov
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Both anaphylactic food allergy and eosinophil-associated gastrointestinal disorders are associated with T(H)2 responses and food-specific IgE, yet they have very different clinical presentations. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the clinical differences between anaphylactic food allergy and eosinophil-associated gastrointestinal disorders are reflected in different T(H)2 responses to foods. METHODS: Subjects with peanut allergy (PA), subjects with allergic eosinophilic gastroenteritis (AEG), and nonatopic subjects were enrolled. Antigen-specific IL-4, IL-5, IFN-gamma, and TNF T-cell responses to peanut, soy, and shrimp were measured by using intracellular cytokine staining and polychromatic flow cytometry. RESULTS: Two distinct subpopulations of T(H)2 cells were found: IL-5+ T(H)2 (IL-4+, IL-5+) and IL-5(-) T(H)2 (IL-4+, IL-5(-)) cells. Peanut-specific IL-5+ T(H)2 cells were present at a 20-fold greater frequency in AEG versus PA (81 vs 4 per 10(6) CD4 cells; P = .05), whereas there were similar frequencies of IL-5(-) T(H)2 cells (67 vs 41 per 10(6)). For all foods, IL-5+ T(H)2 cells accounted for a significantly greater fraction of the antigen-specific cells in AEG relative to PA (29% vs 4%; P < .0001). In PA but not AEG, IL-5(-) T(H)2 responses to peanut were highly correlated with peanut-specific IgE (r = 0.87 vs 0.55, respectively). All subject groups elicited similar very low-magnitude T(H)1 responses to food antigens. CONCLUSION: T(H)2 responses are composed of 2 subpopulations: IL-5+ T(H)2 and IL-5(-) T(H)2 cells. IL-5+ T(H)2 food allergen-specific T cells are singularly associated with AEG, whereas PA is associated with a dominant IL-5(-) T(H)2 response. These results suggest heterogeneity within the T(H)2 cytokine response, with different T(H)2 responses alternatively favoring IgE-mediated or eosinophil-dominant immunopathology.
BACKGROUND: Both anaphylactic food allergy and eosinophil-associated gastrointestinal disorders are associated with T(H)2 responses and food-specific IgE, yet they have very different clinical presentations. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the clinical differences between anaphylactic food allergy and eosinophil-associated gastrointestinal disorders are reflected in different T(H)2 responses to foods. METHODS: Subjects with peanutallergy (PA), subjects with allergic eosinophilic gastroenteritis (AEG), and nonatopic subjects were enrolled. Antigen-specific IL-4, IL-5, IFN-gamma, and TNF T-cell responses to peanut, soy, and shrimp were measured by using intracellular cytokine staining and polychromatic flow cytometry. RESULTS: Two distinct subpopulations of T(H)2 cells were found: IL-5+ T(H)2 (IL-4+, IL-5+) and IL-5(-) T(H)2 (IL-4+, IL-5(-)) cells. Peanut-specific IL-5+ T(H)2 cells were present at a 20-fold greater frequency in AEG versus PA (81 vs 4 per 10(6) CD4 cells; P = .05), whereas there were similar frequencies of IL-5(-) T(H)2 cells (67 vs 41 per 10(6)). For all foods, IL-5+ T(H)2 cells accounted for a significantly greater fraction of the antigen-specific cells in AEG relative to PA (29% vs 4%; P < .0001). In PA but not AEG, IL-5(-) T(H)2 responses to peanut were highly correlated with peanut-specific IgE (r = 0.87 vs 0.55, respectively). All subject groups elicited similar very low-magnitude T(H)1 responses to food antigens. CONCLUSION: T(H)2 responses are composed of 2 subpopulations: IL-5+ T(H)2 and IL-5(-) T(H)2 cells. IL-5+ T(H)2 food allergen-specific T cells are singularly associated with AEG, whereas PA is associated with a dominant IL-5(-) T(H)2 response. These results suggest heterogeneity within the T(H)2 cytokine response, with different T(H)2 responses alternatively favoring IgE-mediated or eosinophil-dominant immunopathology.
Authors: Chris A Liacouras; Jonathan M Spergel; Eduardo Ruchelli; Ritu Verma; Maria Mascarenhas; Edisio Semeao; Jonathan Flick; Janice Kelly; Terry Brown-Whitehorn; Petar Mamula; Jonathan E Markowitz Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Tina B Thottingal; Bill P Stefura; F Estelle R Simons; Gary A Bannon; Wesley Burks; Kent T HayGlass Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2006-08-24 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Michael R Betts; Martha C Nason; Sadie M West; Stephen C De Rosa; Stephen A Migueles; Jonathan Abraham; Michael M Lederman; Jose M Benito; Paul A Goepfert; Mark Connors; Mario Roederer; Richard A Koup Journal: Blood Date: 2006-02-07 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Mübeccel Akdis; Johan Verhagen; Alison Taylor; Fariba Karamloo; Christian Karagiannidis; Reto Crameri; Sarah Thunberg; Günnur Deniz; Rudolf Valenta; Helmut Fiebig; Christian Kegel; Rainer Disch; Carsten B Schmidt-Weber; Kurt Blaser; Cezmi A Akdis Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: J Pablo Abonia; Carine Blanchard; Bridget Buckmeier Butz; Heather F Rainey; Margaret H Collins; Keith Stringer; Philip E Putnam; Marc E Rothenberg Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2010-06-09 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: David Chiang; Xintong Chen; Stacie M Jones; Robert A Wood; Scott H Sicherer; A Wesley Burks; Donald Y M Leung; Charuta Agashe; Alexander Grishin; Peter Dawson; Wendy F Davidson; Leah Newman; Robert Sebra; Miriam Merad; Hugh A Sampson; Bojan Losic; M Cecilia Berin Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 10.793