Literature DB >> 20004431

The relevance of transition zones on computed tomography in the management of small bowel obstruction.

Modesto J Colon1, Dana A Telem, Debbie Wong, Celia M Divino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Frequently, radiologists emphasize radiographic transition zones (RTZs) on computed tomography (CT), which are areas of abrupt change from dilated to collapsed bowel, as pathognomonic for small-bowel obstruction (SBO) diagnosis and location. The relevance of RTZs to patient management remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the surgical predictive value and intraoperative accuracy of RTZ.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 200 patients with SBO who underwent abdominal CT at a single institution from 2002 to 2007 was performed. Statistical analysis was conducted using an unpaired t test, a Chi-square test, and multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Of the 200 patients with SBO, 150 (75%) had an RTZ. Seventy-five (38%) patients required operative intervention; 58 (39%) patients had RTZ and 17 (34%) patients did not have RTZ (P=NS). The presence of RTZ was not associated with increased probability of operative versus nonoperative management (odds ratio=1.19; 95% confidence interval [0.61-2.32]). The mean time to operative intervention was 3.6 days. Immediate operative intervention (<24 h) was equivalent in patients with versus without RTZ (57% vs 53%; P=NS) as was intervention for failed nonoperative management (43% vs 47%; P=NS). For patients who required operative intervention, RTZ correlated with intraoperative site of obstruction in only 31 (63%) patients.
CONCLUSION: The presence of RTZs does not increase the likelihood of operative intervention or identify patients who will fail nonoperative management. RTZ should, therefore, not be used as a major criterion influencing operative versus nonoperative management decisions in patients with SBO. For patients who required operative intervention, RTZ had a 63% correlation with intra-operative findings, which makes it a useful adjunct to pre-operative planning. Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20004431     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  7 in total

1.  Value of gastrografin in adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Anna Weiss; Divya Sood; Scott E Greenway; Marco Tomassi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Decision Making in Bowel Obstruction: A Review.

Authors:  Aswini Kumar Pujahari
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

3.  Computed tomography features associated with operative management for nonstrangulating small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Rakesh R Suri; Parag Vora; John M Kirby; Leyo Ruo
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 4.  Imaging Modalities for Evaluation of Intestinal Obstruction.

Authors:  David W Nelms; Brian R Kann
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-06-02

5.  Optimized protocol of multiple post-processing techniques improves diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography in assessment of small bowel obstruction compared with conventional axial and coronal reformations.

Authors:  Lian-Qin Kuang; Wei Tang; Ran Li; Cheng Cheng; Shuang-Yue Tang; Yi Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  From Blocking Shots to Blocking GI Transit, This Professional Basketball Player Does It All: A Case Report on Small Bowel Obstruction.

Authors:  Emily L DeMaio; Richard C Jarvis; Jessica A Cohen; Courtney N Gleason
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2021-04-01

Review 7.  Small bowel obstruction: a prognostic score index for surgery - a review.

Authors:  Danilo Coco; Silvana Leanza; Irene Fiume
Journal:  Prz Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-08-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.