| Literature DB >> 20004209 |
Peter J Coombs1, Rebecca Harrison, Samantha Pemberton, Adrián Quintero-Martinez, Simon Parry, Stuart M Haslam, Anne Dell, Maureen E Taylor, Kurt Drickamer.
Abstract
Engineered receptor fragments and glycoprotein ligands employed in different assay formats have been used to dissect the basis for the dramatic enhancement of binding of two model membrane receptors, dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule 3-grabbing nonintegrin (DC-SIGN) and the macrophage galactose lectin, to glycoprotein ligands compared to simple sugars. These approaches make it possible to quantify the importance of two major factors that combine to enhance the affinity of single carbohydrate-recognition domains (CRDs) for glycoprotein ligands by 100-to 300-fold. First, the presence of extended binding sites within a single CRD can enhance interaction with branched glycans, resulting in increases of fivefold to 20-fold in affinity. Second, presentation of glycans on a glycoprotein surface increases affinity by 15-to 20-fold, possibly due to low-specificity interactions with the surface of the protein or restriction in the conformation of the glycans. In contrast, when solution-phase networking is avoided, enhancement due to binding of multiple branches of a glycan to multiple CRDs in the oligomeric forms of these receptors is minimal and binding of a receptor oligomer to multiple glycans on a single glycoprotein makes only a twofold contribution to overall affinity. Thus, in these cases, multivalent interactions of individual glycoproteins with individual receptor oligomers have a limited role in achieving high affinity. These findings, combined with considerations of membrane receptor geometry, are consistent with the idea that further enhancement of the binding to multivalent glycoprotein ligands requires interaction of multiple receptor oligomers with the ligands. Copyright (c) 2009. Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 20004209 PMCID: PMC2824085 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.11.073
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mol Biol ISSN: 0022-2836 Impact factor: 5.469
Fig. 1Potential sources of enhanced affinities in glycoprotein-receptor interactions. (a) Glycan branching and attachment of multiple glycans to a glycoprotein increases the number of terminal sugar residues. (b) and (c) Extended binding site interactions can accommodate secondary contact with branches on multi-antennary glycans or with terminal elaborations on individual branches. (d) Direct protein–protein interactions can occur between a CRD and the surface of the protein portion of the glycoprotein. (e) The presence of multiple glycans on a glycoprotein ligand can lead to secondary interactions. (f) and (g), Multiple terminal residues on one glycan or on different glycans attached to a glycoprotein can interact with multiple CRDs in a receptor oligomer. (h) On cell surfaces, CRDs in receptor oligomers can interact with glycans on multiple glycoprotein ligands. (i) In solution, lattices can form from interactions of multivalent ligands with oligomeric lectins. CRDs are shown diagrammatically as spheres and glycoprotein ligands are indicated as cylinders. A galactose-binding receptor is shown for illustration purposes.
Fig. 2Determination of the affinity of DC-SIGN for glycopeptide and glycoprotein ligands. (a) and (b) Binding of monomeric CRD to immobilized SBA and glycopeptide derived from SBA. Data were fit to simple first-order binding curves with a linear increase in nonspecific background binding to derive dissociation constants. (c) Binding of the glycopeptide from SBA to immobilized CRD from DC-SIGN. KD was derived from fitting as in the previous experiments. (d) Binding competition assays in which immobilized CRD from DC-SIGN was probed with 125I-labeled mannose-BSA in the presence of competing ligands. Data were fit to simple first-order competition curves to derive KI values.
Fig. 3Binding competition assays comparing binding of a tri-antennary glycopeptide to MGL. Binding curves for monomeric CRD are shown in blue and curves for trimeric extracellular domain are shown in red. The KI values obtained from these experiments are summarized in Table 2.
Inhibition constants for asialofetuin glycopeptide binding to MGL
| CRD | ECD | |
|---|---|---|
| 260 ± 20 | 160 ± 45 | |
| 21.5 | 35 | |
| Enhancement due to CRD affinity for branched glycans (fold) | 7.2× | |
| Enhancement due to ECD affinity for branched glycans (fold) | 11.7× | |
| Enhancement due to multiple CRDs binding branches (fold) | 1.6× |
Binding inhibition experiments were done on plates coated with the CRD or ECD portions of MGL using 125I-labeled Gal-BSA as the reporter ligand.
Fig. 4Creation and characterization of glycosylation variants of orosomucoid. (a)–(d) Modeled structures of mutants with 1 to 4 glycosylation sites. (e) SDS-PAGE of a selection of glycosylation variants. Glycoproteins purified by affinity chromatography on immobilized nickel columns were visualized on the gel by staining with Coomassie brilliant blue. The model was created with InsightII and Molscript based on the structure of bovine lactoglobulin (PDB ID 1B8E).
Distribution of N-linked glycans on variant asialo-orosomucoid molecules
| Variant | Bi-antennary (%) | Tri-antennary (%) | Tetra-antennary (%) | Terminal galactose residues |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1a | 45 | 51 | 3 | 2.6 |
| 1b | 67 | 30 | 2 | 2.3 |
| 1c | 89 | 11 | 1 | 2.2 |
| Average for single-site variants | 2.4 | |||
| 2a | 25 | 59 | 16 | 5.8 |
| 2b | 47 | 47 | 5 | 5.1 |
| 2c | 45 | 36 | 19 | 5.5 |
| 2d | 32 | 53 | 16 | 5.8 |
| 2e | 37 | 43 | 21 | 5.8 |
| 2f | 40 | 40 | 20 | 5.6 |
| Average for two-site variants | 5.6 | |||
| 3 | 36 | 43 | 21 | 8.6 |
| 4 | 35 | 39 | 26 | 11.6 |
| 5 | 33 | 42 | 26 | 14.8 |
| Serum-derived | 14 | 38 | 48 | 16.7 |
Values from Ref. [33].
Fig. 5Competition experiments to quantify binding of orosomucoid variants to the CRD from MGL. Examples of ligands with a range of affinities are shown, with measured data shown as circles and fitted curves indicated as lines.
Inhibition constants for binding to MGL
| Ligand | CRD | ECD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galactose | 5600 ± 150 | |||||
| OR-1b glycopeptide | 450 ± 10 | 12.4 | 5.1 | |||
| OR-1a | 31 ± 2 | 34 ± 1 | ||||
| OR-1b | 20 ± 6 | 20 ± 2 | ||||
| OR-1c | 17 ± 3 | 20 ± 1 | ||||
| Average | 23 ± 6 | 243 | 101 | 25 ± 7 | 224 | 93 |
| OR-2a | 4.7 | 3.1 | ||||
| OR-2b | 13 | 7.5 | ||||
| OR-2c | 11 | 2.1 | ||||
| OR-2d | 10 | 5.0 | ||||
| OR-2e | 2.3 | 8.5 | ||||
| OR-2f | 6.4 | 2.5 | ||||
| Average | 8 ± 4 | 700 | 125 | 4.8 ± 2.5 | 1170 | 209 |
| OR-3 | 6.5 | 930 | 110 | 1.5 | 3700 | 434 |
| OR-4 | 3.6 | 1550 | 134 | 0.9 | 6200 | 540 |
| OR-5 | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 4000 | 270 | 0.65 ± 0.12 | 8615 | 582 |
| Serum-derived OR | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 31,000 | 1850 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 47,000 | 2800 |
Binding inhibition experiments were done on plates coated with the CRD or ECD portions of MGL, using 125I-labeled Gal-BSA as the reporter ligand.
Fig. 6Summary of the sources of enhanced affinity for glycoproteins binding to MGL. The KI values from Table 3 are linked by the fold enhancement resulting from various factors. Letters in parentheses refer to the illustrations in Fig. 1.