Literature DB >> 20004130

Objective versus subjective measures of the built environment, which are most effective in capturing associations with walking?

Lin Lin1, Anne Vernez Moudon.   

Abstract

This study compared the strength of association of objective and subjective measures of environment with walking sufficiently for health. It used an existing model, which employed only objective environmental measures and adjusted for socio-demographic covariates, to estimate the influence of the built environment on walking. The original model was re-run with new, subjectively measured variables. The results showed that objective measures of the built environment had stronger associations with walking than subjective measures. Future studies of the environmental influences on physical activity should include objective measures of the built environment. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 20004130     DOI： 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Place        ISSN： 1353-8292            Impact factor:   4.078


  29 in total

1.  Analyzing Walking Route Choice through Built Environments using Random Forests and Discrete Choice Techniques.

Authors:  Calvin P Tribby; Harvey J Miller; Barbara B Brown; Carol M Werner; Ken R Smith
Journal:  Environ Plan B Urban Anal City Sci       Date:  2016-07-20

Review 2.  Understanding Embodiment in Place-Health Research: Approaches, Limitations, and Opportunities.

Authors:  Ryan Petteway; Mahasin Mujahid; Amani Allen
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Neighborhood disorder and telomeres: connecting children's exposure to community level stress and cellular response.

Authors:  Katherine P Theall; Zoë H Brett; Elizabeth A Shirtcliff; Erin C Dunn; Stacy S Drury
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Cognition in Context: The Role of Objective and Subjective Measures of Neighborhood and Household in Cognitive Functioning in Later Life.

Authors:  Haena Lee; Linda J Waite
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2018-01-18

5.  Physical Activity in Older Adults: an Ecological Approach.

Authors:  Christina M Thornton; Jacqueline Kerr; Terry L Conway; Brian E Saelens; James F Sallis; David K Ahn; Lawrence D Frank; Kelli L Cain; Abby C King
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2017-04

6.  A dynamic framework on travel mode choice focusing on utilitarian walking based on the integration of current knowledge.

Authors:  Yong Yang
Journal:  J Transp Health       Date:  2016-03-17

7.  Predictors of discordance between perceived and objective neighborhood data.

Authors:  Erin J Bailey; Kristen C Malecki; Corinne D Engelman; Matthew C Walsh; Andrew J Bersch; Ana P Martinez-Donate; Paul E Peppard; F Javier Nieto
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  Measuring physical activity-related environmental factors: reliability and predictive validity of the European environmental questionnaire ALPHA.

Authors:  Heleen Spittaels; Maïté Verloigne; Christopher Gidlow; Julien Gloanec; Sylvia Titze; Charlie Foster; Jean-Michel Oppert; Harry Rutter; Pekka Oja; Michael Sjöström; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  Positive Action for Today's Health (PATH): Sex differences in walking and perceptions of the physical and social environment.

Authors:  Nevelyn N Trumpeter; Dawn K Wilson
Journal:  Environ Behav       Date:  2013-04-17

10.  Do observed or perceived characteristics of the neighborhood environment mediate associations between neighborhood poverty and cumulative biological risk?

Authors:  Amy J Schulz; Graciela Mentz; Laurie Lachance; Shannon N Zenk; Jonetta Johnson; Carmen Stokes; Rebecca Mandell
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 4.078
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.