Literature DB >> 20004104

Custom-made hinged spacers in revision knee surgery for patients with infection, bone loss and instability.

S Macmull1, W Bartlett, J Miles, G W Blunn, R C Pollock, R W J Carrington, J A Skinner, S R Cannon, T W R Briggs.   

Abstract

Polymethyl methacrylate spacers are commonly used during staged revision knee arthroplasty for infection. In cases with extensive bone loss and ligament instability, such spacers may not preserve limb length, joint stability and motion. We report a retrospective case series of 19 consecutive patients using a custom-made cobalt chrome hinged spacer with antibiotic-loaded cement. The "SMILES spacer" was used at first-stage revision knee arthroplasty for chronic infection associated with a significant bone loss due to failed revision total knee replacement in 11 patients (58%), tumour endoprosthesis in four patients (21%), primary knee replacement in two patients (11%) and infected metalwork following fracture or osteotomy in a further two patients (11%). Mean follow-up was 38 months (range 24-70). In 12 (63%) patients, infection was eradicated, three patients (16%) had persistent infection and four (21%) developed further infection after initially successful second-stage surgery. Above knee amputation for persistent infection was performed in two patients. In this particularly difficult to treat population, the SMILES spacer two-stage technique has demonstrated encouraging results and presents an attractive alternative to arthrodesis or amputation.
Copyright © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20004104     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  6 in total

1.  The use of spacers (static and mobile) in infection knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Luca Mazzucchelli; Federica Rosso; Antongiulio Marmotti; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Matteo Bruzzone; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

2.  Results of sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: an editorial comment on recently published in the Journal of Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chao Jiang; Wenwei Qian
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-11

3.  [Dynamic versus static cement spacer in periprosthetic knee infection: A meta-analysis].

Authors:  Mustafa Citak; Musa Citak; Daniel Kendoff
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Amputation as a Complication after Total Knee Replacement, is it a Real Concern to be Discussed?: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alireza Mousavian; Soheil Sabzevari; Shirin Ghiasi; Omid Shahpari; Amin Razi; Adel Ebrahimpour; Mohammad H Ebrahimzadeh
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2021-01

5.  Patient reported outcome measures after revision of the infected TKR: comparison of single versus two-stage revision.

Authors:  Paul Baker; Timothy G Petheram; Steven Kurtz; Yrjö T Konttinen; Paul Gregg; David Deehan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Biarticular total femur spacer for massive femoral bone loss: the mobile solution for a big problem.

Authors:  Pablo Sanz-Ruiz; Jose Antonio Calvo-Haro; Manuel Villanueva-Martinez; Jose Antonio Matas-Diez; Javier Vaquero-Martín
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2017-03-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.