Literature DB >> 20003873

Comparison of the proximal chevron and Ludloff osteotomies for the correction of hallux valgus.

Woo Jin Choi1, Han Kook Yoon, Hang Seob Yoon, Bom Soo Kim, Jin Woo Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although several studies have described good results of proximal chevron and Ludloff osteotomies, there have been no studies comparing the results of these two techniques at a single institution.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We consecutively evaluated 46 patients who underwent proximal chevron osteotomies and 52 patients who underwent Ludloff osteotomies. Patients were evaluated by preoperative and postoperative weight bearing radiographs and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux MP score.
RESULTS: Both groups had similarly high AOFAS scores and good correction by radiographic parameters. No statistically significant differences were found with respect to correction of hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) between the two groups. Significant shortening of the first metatarsal was found after Ludloff osteotomy (p < 0.05). At 6 weeks after surgery, the pain subscore was significantly lower in the proximal chevron group than in the Ludloff group (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The proximal chevron and Ludloff osteotomies yielded equivalent clinical and radiological results. The Ludloff osteotomy with lag screw fixation is more stable and does not require postoperative hardware removal, although it is technically demanding and has a tendency toward greater shortening of the first metatarsal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20003873     DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2009.1154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  8 in total

Review 1.  The Ludloff osteotomy: a review of current concepts.

Authors:  Deborah A Castaneda; Mark S Myerson; Steven K Neufeld
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The effect of hallux valgus open and percutaneous surgery on AOFAS scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luis Enrique Hernández-Castillejo; Celia Álvarez-Bueno; Miriam Garrido-Miguel; Ana Torres-Costoso; Sara Reina-Gutiérrez; Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Angular correction and complications of proximal first metatarsal osteotomies for hallux valgus deformity.

Authors:  Reinhard Schuh; Madeleine Willegger; Johannes Holinka; Robin Ristl; Reinhard Windhager; Axel H Wanivenhaus
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Minimally invasive vs open distal metatarsal osteotomy for hallux valgus - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maninder Shah Singh; Ankit Khurana; Darshan Kapoor; Shyam Katekar; Arun Kumar; Gayatri Vishwakarma
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-04-21

5.  First metatarsal proximal opening wedge osteotomy for correction of hallux valgus deformity: comparison of straight versus oblique osteotomy.

Authors:  Seung Hwan Han; Eui Hyun Park; Joon Jo; Yong Gon Koh; Jin Woo Lee; Woo Jin Choi; Yong Sang Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.759

6.  Proximal metatarsal osteotomy for hallux valgus: an audit of radiologic outcome after single screw fixation and full postoperative weightbearing.

Authors:  Falk Mittag; Ulf Leichtle; Christoph Meisner; Ingmar Ipach; Nikolaus Wülker; Markus Wünschel
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  Point-Connecting Measurements of the Hallux Valgus Deformity: A New Measurement and Its Clinical Application.

Authors:  Jeong-Ho Seo; Ji-Yong Ahn; Dimas Boedijono
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Minimally invasive versus open chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus correction: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Gerhard Kaufmann; Dietmar Dammerer; Felix Heyenbrock; Matthias Braito; Lorenz Moertlbauer; Michael Liebensteiner
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.075

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.