| Literature DB >> 20003262 |
Ka Ka Ting1, Bruce J Brew, Gilles J Guillemin.
Abstract
The excitotoxin quinolinic acid (QUIN) is synthesized through the kynurenine pathway (KP) by activated monocyte lineage cells. QUIN is likely to play a role in the pathogenesis of several major neuroinflammatory diseases including Alzheimer's disease (AD). The presence of reactive astrocytes, astrogliosis, increased oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokines are important pathological hallmarks of AD. We assessed the stimulatory effects of QUIN at low physiological to high excitotoxic concentrations in comparison with the cytokines commonly associated with AD including IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha on primary human astrocytes. We found that QUIN induces IL-1beta expression, a key mediator in AD pathogenesis, in human astrocytes. We also explored the effect of QUIN on astrocyte morphology and functions. At low concentrations, QUIN treatment induced concomitantly a marked increase in glial fibrillary acid protein levels and reduction in vimentin levels compared to controls; features consistent with astrogliosis. At pathophysiological concentrations QUIN induced a switch between structural protein expressions in a dose dependent manner, increasing VIM and concomitantly decreasing GFAP expression. Glutamine synthetase (GS) activity was used as a functional metabolic test for astrocytes. We found a significant dose-dependent reduction in GS activity following QUIN treatment. All together, this study showed that QUIN is an important factor for astroglial activation, dysregulation and cell death with potential relevance to AD and other neuroinflammatory diseases.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 20003262 PMCID: PMC2797503 DOI: 10.1186/1742-2094-6-36
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuroinflammation ISSN: 1742-2094 Impact factor: 8.322
Summary of the effects of QUIN in comparison with Aβ mediated toxicity
| QUIN toxicity | References | Aβ toxicity | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| • | (Platenik et al., 2001) (Stone and Perkins, 1981) | • | (Huang et al., 1999) (Varadarajan et al., 2001) (Markesbery and Lovell, 1998) (Tamaoka et al., 2000) |
| • | (Maldonado et al., 2007) | • DNA damage by ROS leads to | (Meyer et al., 2006) (Love et al., 1999) |
| • | (Guillemin et al., 2003b) (Dihne et al., 2001) (Hanbury et al., 2002) | • | Griffin and Mrak, 2002) (Murphy et al., 1998) (Selmaj et al., 1990) |
| • | (Tavares | • Aβ can | (Lafon-Cazal et al., 1993; Keller et al., 1997; Lauderback et al., 2001) (Harris et al., 1995; Harris et al., 1996) |
| • NMDA receptor activation by QUIN can lead to Aβ production. | (Lesne | • Aβ can induce IDO in the KP and increase production of QUIN. | (Guillemin et al., 2003a) |
PCR primer sequences
| End-point PCR Primers | Forward | Reverse | Size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | ACCACCATGGAGAAGGCTGG | CTCAGTGTAGCCCAGGATGC | 509 |
| IL-1β | ATG GCAGAAGTACCTGAGCTC | TTAGGAAGACACAAATTGCATGGTGAA | 810 |
| IL-6 | GTGTGAAAGCAGCAAAGAGGC | CTGGAGGTACTCTAGGTATAC | 159 |
| GFAP | CTGGGCTCAAGCAGTCTACC | CTGGGGTTAAGAAGCAGCAG | 666 |
| GS | AAGTGTGTGGAAGAGTTGCC | TGCTCACCATGTCCATTATC | 234 |
| S100β | ATGTCTGAGCTGGAGAAGG | CTGTCTGCTTTCTTGCATG | 415 |
| β-actin | TCACCCACACTGTGCCCATCTACGA | CAGCGGAACCGCTCATTGCCAATGG | 295 |
| Vimentin | GAGAACTTTGCCGTTGAAGC | TCCAGCAGCTTCCTGTAGGT | 170 |
| IL1β | AAGGCGGCCAGGATATAACT | CCCTAGGGATTGAGTCCACA | 102 |
| GFAP | TCTCTCGGAGTATCTGGGAACTG | TTCCCTTTCCTGTCTGAGTCTCA | 81 |
Figure 1(A) Ethidium bromide-stained gel showing mRNA expression of GS and GAPDH 24 hrs after cytokine or QUIN treatments. Results are expressed as a ratio of specific gene expression normalized against expression of the housekeeping gene GAPDH. Standard errors were always 5%. (B) Glutamine synthetase activity after 24 hours stimulation with QUIN. GS enzyme assay has been done in triplicate (P < 0.05 was taken as significant).
Figure 2Expression of VIM, GFAP and IL-1β genes following 24 hours stimulation with cytokine/growth factor and QUIN. Real-time PCR results for VIM (a and b), GFAP (c and d), IL-1β (e and f). Each experiment repeated, n = 3. A statistical value of P < 0.05 was taken as significant.
Figure 3Quantification of GFAP and vimentin using ELISA after 24 hours stimulation with IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-α and QUIN. GFAP and VIM indirect ELISA have been done in triplicates. All samples except IFN-γ stimulated VIM protein expression and 50 nM QUIN stimulated GFAP expression were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Proliferation measurement after stimulation with QUIN for 96 hours, SF = serum free, 5% FCS = normal control and 10% FCS = positive control. Statistical values of P < 0.05 = *, P < 0.01 = ** and P < 0.001 = *** were taken as significant. Proliferation assay was optimized at 96 hours and was done in triplicates. The normal control (5% FCS) was set to 0%.