Literature DB >> 20002803

Haemostatic effect and tissue reactions of methods and agents used for haemorrhage control in apical surgery.

S S Jensen1, P M Yazdi, E Hjørting-Hansen, D D Bosshardt, T von Arx.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the haemostatic effect and tissue reactions of different agents and methods used for haemorrhage control in apical surgery.
METHODOLOGY: Six standardized bone defects were prepared in the calvaria of six Burgundy rabbits. Five haemostatic modalities were tested for their haemostatic effect and tissue reactions, and were compared with untreated control defects: Expasyl + Stasis, Expasyl + Stasi + freshening of the bone defect with a bur, Spongostan, Spongostan+ epinephrine, and electro cauterization. The haemostatic effect was analysed visually and compared using Wilcoxon's signed rank test. Two groups of three animals were evaluated histologically for hard and soft tissue reactions related to the different haemostatic measures, after 3 and 12 weeks of healing respectively.
RESULTS: Expasyl + Stasis and electro cauterization proved most effective in reducing bleeding (P < 0.05), but were accompanied by unfavourable tissue reactions, as indicated by the presence of necrotic bone, inflammatory cells and the absence of bone repair. These adverse tissue reactions did not recover substantially over time. However, adverse reactions were not observed when the superficial layer of bone had been removed with a rotary instrument. In contrast, Spongostan + epinephrine showed only a moderate haemostatic effect, but elicited also only mild adverse tissue reactions.
CONCLUSIONS: Haemostasis in experimental bone defects is most effectively accomplished by using Expasyl + Stasis or electro cauterization. However, the bone defects should be freshened with a rotary instrument before suturing so as not to compromise healing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20002803     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01637.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Endod J        ISSN: 0143-2885            Impact factor:   5.264


  8 in total

Review 1.  Endodontic surgery.

Authors:  B S Chong; J S Rhodes
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Trial finds better haemostasis with aluminium chloride during periapical surgery.

Authors:  Niall Mc Goldrick; Carly Ross; James Nelson
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2017-06-23

3.  Efficacy of infiltrative local anesthesia and inferior alveolar nerve block in periapical surgery of lower premolars and molars: A preliminary report.

Authors:  Isabel Menéndez-Nieto; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago; Juan Cervera-Ballester; María Peñarrocha-Diago; David Peñarrocha-Oltra
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-06-01

4.  Pain and swelling after periapical surgery related to the hemostatic agent used: anesthetic solution with vasoconstrictor or aluminum chloride.

Authors:  Maria Peñarrocha-Diago; Laura Maestre-Ferrín; David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Cosme Gay-Escoda; Tomas von-Arx; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-07-01

5.  Safety and effectiveness of a synthetic hemostatic patch for intraoperative soft tissue bleeding.

Authors:  Christoph Schuhmacher; Johann Pratschke; Sascha Weiss; Stefan Schneeberger; André L Mihaljevic; Rebekka Schirren; Michael Winkler; Nikos Emmanouilidis
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-03-31

Review 6.  Biologic response of local hemostatic agents used in endodontic microsurgery.

Authors:  Youngjune Jang; Hyeon Kim; Byoung-Duck Roh; Euiseong Kim
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2014-03-21

7.  Effect of the plant-based hemostatic agent Ankaferd Blood Stopper® on the biocompatibility of mineral trioxide aggregate.

Authors:  Muzaffer Emir Dinçol; Hakan Ozbas; Bulent Yılmaz; Handan Ersev; Selcuk Gokyay; Vakur Olgac
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Influence of hemostatic agents upon the outcome of periapical surgery: dressings with anesthetic and vasoconstrictor or aluminum chloride.

Authors:  María Peñarrocha-Diago; Laura Maestre-Ferrín; David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Thomas von Arx; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-03-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.