OBJECTIVE: We investigated the mechanism responsible for imatinib (IM) resistance in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph(+) ALL) cell lines. METHODS: We established cell lines from a patient with Ph(+) ALL at the time of first diagnosis and relapsed phase and designated as NPhA1 and NPhA2, respectively. We also derived IM-resistant cells, NPhA2/STIR, from NPhA2 under gradually increasing IM concentrations. RESULTS: NPhA1 was sensitive to IM (IC(50) 0.05 microm) and NPhA2 showed mild IM resistance (IC(50) 0.3 microm). NPhA2/STIR could be maintained in the presence of 10 microm IM. Phosphorylation of MEK and ERK was slightly elevated in NPhA2 and significantly elevated in NPhA2/STIR compared to NPhA1 cells. After treatment with IM, phosphorylation of MEK and ERK was not suppressed but rather increased in NPhA2 and NPhA2/STIR. Active RAS was also increased markedly in NPhA2/STIR after IM treatment. The expression of BCL-2 was increased in NPhA2 compared to NPhA1, but no further increase in NPhA2/STIR. Proliferation of NPhA2/STIR was significantly inhibited by a combination of MEK inhibitor and IM. Analysis of tyrosine phosphorylation status with a protein tyrosine kinase array showed increased phosphorylation of EphB4 in NPhA2/STIR after IM treatment. Although transcription of EphB4 was suppressed in NPhA1 and NPhA2 after IM treatment, it was not suppressed and its ligand, ephrinB2, was increased in NPhA2/STIR. Suppression of EphB4 transcripts by introducing short hairpin RNA into NPhA2/STIR partially restored their sensitivity to IM. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a new mechanism of IM resistance mediated by the activation of RAS/MAPK pathway and EphB4.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the mechanism responsible for imatinib (IM) resistance in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph(+) ALL) cell lines. METHODS: We established cell lines from a patient with Ph(+) ALL at the time of first diagnosis and relapsed phase and designated as NPhA1 and NPhA2, respectively. We also derived IM-resistant cells, NPhA2/STIR, from NPhA2 under gradually increasing IM concentrations. RESULTS: NPhA1 was sensitive to IM (IC(50) 0.05 microm) and NPhA2 showed mild IM resistance (IC(50) 0.3 microm). NPhA2/STIR could be maintained in the presence of 10 microm IM. Phosphorylation of MEK and ERK was slightly elevated in NPhA2 and significantly elevated in NPhA2/STIR compared to NPhA1 cells. After treatment with IM, phosphorylation of MEK and ERK was not suppressed but rather increased in NPhA2 and NPhA2/STIR. Active RAS was also increased markedly in NPhA2/STIR after IM treatment. The expression of BCL-2 was increased in NPhA2 compared to NPhA1, but no further increase in NPhA2/STIR. Proliferation of NPhA2/STIR was significantly inhibited by a combination of MEK inhibitor and IM. Analysis of tyrosine phosphorylation status with a protein tyrosine kinase array showed increased phosphorylation of EphB4 in NPhA2/STIR after IM treatment. Although transcription of EphB4 was suppressed in NPhA1 and NPhA2 after IM treatment, it was not suppressed and its ligand, ephrinB2, was increased in NPhA2/STIR. Suppression of EphB4 transcripts by introducing short hairpin RNA into NPhA2/STIR partially restored their sensitivity to IM. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a new mechanism of IM resistance mediated by the activation of RAS/MAPK pathway and EphB4.
Authors: Leisl M Packer; Sareena Rana; Robert Hayward; Thomas O'Hare; Christopher A Eide; Ana Rebocho; Sonja Heidorn; Matthew S Zabriskie; Ion Niculescu-Duvaz; Brian J Druker; Caroline Springer; Richard Marais Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2011-12-13 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Lin Li; Na Xu; Jin-Fang Zhang; Lu-Lu Xu; Xuan Zhou; Bin-Tao Huang; Yu-Ling Li; Xiao-Li Liu Journal: Int J Med Sci Date: 2016-04-28 Impact factor: 3.738