Literature DB >> 20001871

Prospective observational study of postoperative complications after percutaneous dilatational or surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients.

Julie K Barbetti1, Alistair D Nichol, Kim R Choate, Michael J Bailey, Geraldine A Lee, D James Cooper.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess and describe postoperative complications of single dilator percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) and surgical tracheostomy (ST) in a large series of critically ill patients.
METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in 1163 critically ill patients in a university affiliated tertiary referral hospital between 2002 and 2007. PDT was the procedure of choice for all critically ill patients requiring tracheostomy except for those with an anatomic abnormality or refractory coagulopathy, who underwent ST. Demographic and postoperative complication data were collected in a web-based database.
RESULTS: 913 patients (79%) underwent PDT at the bedside in the ICU, and 250 (21%) underwent ST in the operating theatre. The tracheostomy tube was larger, and the duration of tracheostomy cannulation was shorter after PDT than after ST. The postoperative complication rate for PDT was 9.6% compared with 19.6% for ST (P<0.001). Tracheal tube obstruction and displacement were significantly less frequent after PDT (obstruction 1.0% for PDT v 3.6% for ST, P = 0.007; displacement, 1.3% for PDT v 4.8% for ST, P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: In a large heterogeneous group of critically ill patients, single dilator PDT was safe and had few postoperative complications. Although ST was used in higher-risk patients, those who underwent PDT were more likely to receive a larger-sized tracheostomy tube; they were also less likely to experience obstruction or displacement of the postoperative tracheostomy tube. These differences are probably related to a combination of patient selection, smaller, shorter tracheostomy tubes, and larger tissue incision size with ST.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20001871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Resusc        ISSN: 1441-2772            Impact factor:   2.159


  6 in total

1.  Technical Improvements of Difficult Tracheotomy.

Authors:  Yongzhong Fan; Jundan Cai; Chaojun Yan
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Safety of Prophylactic Anticoagulation During Bedside Procedures: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study.

Authors:  Cassie A Barton; David S Shapiro; Andrew J Webb; Brendan Gontarz; Martin Schreiber
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  State of the art: percutaneous tracheostomy in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Christian Ghattas; Sammar Alsunaid; Edward M Pickering; Van K Holden
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 3.005

4.  Impact of real-time ultrasound guidance on complications of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Venkatakrishna Rajajee; Craig A Williamson; Brady T West
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Percutaneous tracheostomy in patients on anticoagulants.

Authors:  Laura Pasin; Elena Frati; Luca Cabrini; Giovanni Landoni; Pasquale Nardelli; Tiziana Bove; Maria Grazia Calabro; Anna Mara Scandroglio; Federico Pappalardo; Alberto Zangrillo
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

6.  Percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy in high-risk ICU patients.

Authors:  Andreas Schäfer; Martin Orban; Enzo Lüsebrink; Alexander Krogmann; Franziska Tietz; Matthias Riebisch; Rainer Okrojek; Friedhelm Peltz; Carsten Skurk; Carsten Hullermann; Jan Sackarnd; Dietmar Wassilowsky; Karl Toischer; Clemens Scherer; Michael Preusch; Christoph Testori; Ulrike Flierl; Sven Peterss; Sabine Hoffmann; Nikolaus Kneidinger; Christian Hagl; Steffen Massberg; Sebastian Zimmer; Peter Luedike; Tienush Rassaf; Holger Thiele
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 6.925

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.